Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin

Biggest problem is it doesn’t fit in existing terminals. That’s why Boeing didn’t go for the jump to super-duper jumbo jet. They’ve gone through those growing pains before and saw the market wasn’t good for doing it. A plane you can’t actually use (at least not conveniently, who really wants to ground load a plane that big) doesn’t have a market.


3 posted on 06/21/2017 9:09:40 AM PDT by discostu (You are what you is, and that's all it is, you ain't what you're not, so see what you got.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: discostu

Boeing is betting on smaller, longer range aircraft for point to point air travel. Essentially reworking the hub and spoke airline model. Hub and spoke made sense back when the only long range aircraft were the jumbos.

That’s no longer true.


22 posted on 06/21/2017 9:42:55 AM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: discostu
In fact, Airbus HAD to convince airports to upgrade their runways, taxiways and gate areas to accommodate the A380-800.

But what happened was Boeing's unexpected success with the 777-300ER and the strong sales of the 787-8 and 787-9, which has proven that passengers want point-to-point long-range flights, not hub-to-hub long-range flights. Indeed, the 787-9 made it possible for several Chinese airlines to fly from multiple cities in China directly to western Europe and the USA at reasonable cost.

30 posted on 06/21/2017 9:54:16 AM PDT by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's economic cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson