Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Was Sherman a war criminal?
AJC.com ^ | June 13, 2014 | David Ibata, et al

Posted on 05/02/2017 5:06:54 PM PDT by BenLurkin

...Civil War historians argue opposite sides of the debate.

...

After World War II, the Nuremberg Charter defined war crimes as violations of the laws or customs of war. It lists several categories of offenses....

Murder or ill-treatment of civilians: Union artillery had barely gotten into range of Atlanta when, on July 19, 1864, Sherman ordered a bombardment of the city’s buildings: “No consideration must be paid to the fact they are occupied by families, but the place must be cannonaded.” The Yankee guns fired their first shells on July 20, and within a few days, Confederate newspapers began reporting casualties. One shell wounded a woman and killed the child she was carrying in her arms. In my book, I have concluded that the victims were the wife and child of John M. Weaver, an engineer who lived on Walton Street.

Sherman maintained a perverse determination to shell Atlanta, denying that innocent civilians still lived there. “You may fire from 10 to 15 shots from every gun you have in position into Atlanta that will reach any of its houses,” he ordered his artillery on Aug. 1. “Fire slowly and with deliberation between 4 p.m. and dark.”

...

On Sept. 4, just days after his troops entered Atlanta, Sherman dictated his Special Field Orders 67: “The City of Atlanta being exclusively required for warlike purposes, will at once be vacated by all except the Armies of the United States.” Civilians wishing to go south would be taken to Confederate lines under truce flags; the Rebels would then have to transport them on to Macon. The displaced could take some possessions, but most of their property, not to mention their homes, would be left behind.

(Excerpt) Read more at atlantaforward.blog.ajc.com ...


TOPICS: History
KEYWORDS: confederacy; dixie; sherman; warcriminal; winner
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last
To: PittsburghAfterDark

If political correctness has taught us nothing it has shown that it is impossible to ascribe current cultural norms and acceptance to historical facts.

And yet they keep trying.
Because norms are more important to the agenda than facts
to them. Control the narrative, control the past, control
the present is the name of their game.


21 posted on 05/02/2017 5:28:37 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

The case for reparations is clear.


22 posted on 05/02/2017 5:30:37 PM PDT by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kaehurowing

Like


23 posted on 05/02/2017 5:31:03 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

As the man stated: “War is Hell.”


24 posted on 05/02/2017 5:32:34 PM PDT by D_Idaho ("For we wrestle not against flesh and blood...".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

If so then war itself is a crime, and everyone involved a criminal.


25 posted on 05/02/2017 5:34:02 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Some people consider government to be a necessary evil, others their personal Ponzi scheme.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Did Sherman fit the definition of a war criminal? Yes. Is he a war criminal? No. Only the losers can be war criminals.


26 posted on 05/02/2017 5:34:42 PM PDT by RedWulf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

No


27 posted on 05/02/2017 5:39:29 PM PDT by pissant ((Deport 'em all))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gen.Blather; DoodleDawg
Wasn’t it Sherman who advised the Kaiser in the Franco Prussian war?

Uh ... no.

First I've heard of it anyway.

28 posted on 05/02/2017 5:41:09 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

No.


29 posted on 05/02/2017 5:44:36 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Was Sherman a war criminal?

Sherman was both a war criminal and a war hero—and neither a war criminal nor a war hero.

In one sense—dispassionate theoretical evaluation—Sherman doubtless committed acts that—to the modern sensibility as well as that of his contemporaries—would be considered "war crimes".

In another sense—practicing the art of warfare—Sherman was simply a high-ranking soldier following the orders of his commander in chief—orders that specifically requested the "scorched earth" tactics that he employed.

Like any prominent historical figure—especially an American—Sherman is hard to pigeonhole, IMHO...

30 posted on 05/02/2017 5:46:21 PM PDT by sargon ("If we were in the midst of a zombie apocalypse, the Left would protest for zombies' rights.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Yes.


31 posted on 05/02/2017 5:46:37 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Compared to ‘Spoons’ Butler (sometimes called ‘Beast’ Butler), Sherman was an angel. He didn’t steal for personal enrichment and he didn’t authorize his troops to rape the women.


32 posted on 05/02/2017 5:46:51 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lysandru; rockrr
I have read that Sherman forced Confederate PoWs to remove landmines emplaced by Confederate forces.

I googled that and got this:

This title is pretty misleading and implies that Sherman was marching them around to clear the mines by stepping on them...

But if you actually read the link, you'd see that after the Union took the fort. He basically was like, "you guys planted them, now you guys gotta dig em up".

If so, it wasn't any war crime.

33 posted on 05/02/2017 5:48:45 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

Very interesting. Thanks for the book information...


34 posted on 05/02/2017 5:50:58 PM PDT by sargon ("If we were in the midst of a zombie apocalypse, the Left would protest for zombies' rights.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Sherman did nowhere the crimes against humanity than did Col. Hurst of the 6th Tennessee Cavalry. Sherman did what was necessary, Hurst did for evil, spite, and greed.
35 posted on 05/02/2017 5:54:44 PM PDT by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gen.Blather

Sherman was still a professional military man after the war, and was Commanding General of the Army from 1869 to 1883. He wouldn’t have been able to officially advise a foreign head of state of anything under those circumstances.


36 posted on 05/02/2017 5:55:24 PM PDT by Campion (Halten Sie sich unbedingt an die Lehre!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Was President Harry S. Truman?


37 posted on 05/02/2017 5:59:42 PM PDT by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wH-pk2vZG2M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

War has no rules, that’s why it is called ‘war’.


38 posted on 05/02/2017 6:00:14 PM PDT by CodeToad (If it weren't for physics and law enforcement, I'd be unstoppable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sargon

in the early 1980’s we were touring an antebellum plantation in Louisiana. An older lady, most likely a local was the guide. During the conversation I brought up General Sherman. This woman responded angrily that she would be grateful if I would not bring up his name again in her presence. I reacted by asking what could be the problem with that as the Civil War was (at that time) was over 120 years ago. She sniffed “you sir have no idea what that man did to my family”.

it was unreal.


39 posted on 05/02/2017 6:05:09 PM PDT by tenthirteen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin; All

Read “The Siege Of Atlanta, 1864” by Samuel Carter III.
Lots of info on how General Sherman acted.


40 posted on 05/02/2017 6:05:59 PM PDT by TaMoDee (Go Pack Go! The Pack will be back in 2017!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson