“I don’t have time or desire to search to find out if he has actually been on your holy grail “The View,” but I suggest that you hold your powder on the keyboard until you actually do some research. You will look smarter. “
I happened to watch it twice.....so ppppffff.
So you don’t have the time/desire but you certainly found the time/desire to soundly verbalize your disdain for me.....I disdain you X2...there I told you!
So mr Dryfus/Hollywood ass kisser you can’t lay a glove on me.
Also, he wanted to promote his initiative.
Yea, a self absorbed, look at me blog, full of click bait, with a single follower..... YOU .
I don’t disdain you~~I disagree with you...I think you are posting unsupported hyperbole that is not supported by facts. This is a political forum...if you had been here longer, you would understand that people debate and disagree all the time.
—Yes, I do like to support my contentions...However, I am not going to spend an hour looking to see if he was on The View...that really should be your job to look before you post.
Sadly you watched twice but missed the part where he actually states he is not into political parties...i.e. -he is not a democrat...Yet you rant and attack both him and me with no basis. You may not like the guy which is fine, but your basis is unfounded, and many on the thread found his interview surprisingly refreshing.
Oh, and just so you know I am not some big fan of Dreyfuss— I just like to see thoughtful, accurate, articulate posts on Free Republic...
By the way, noob (Jan, 2017), you are violating language rules—no profanity or personal attacks...says so right under your post box...Don’t even know what you mean by calling me what you did and talking about laying a glove on you? Why would I? In addition to doing a little research before posting, how about reading the posting rules?
Here's a lesson in reading comprehension! I never said Dryfuss was on the view. I said, if he was serious about his SUDDEN LOVE for the constitution and not being partisan, he would go on the view! However, he feels the need to tell conservatives about the need for civics classes! Who knew conservatives don't support civics classes!
Dryfuss for eight years NEVER said a word about Obummer shredding the Constitution ever . Three months after Trump is elected, Dryfuss feels the need to get on with Tucker to tell the viewers that only congress can spend OR withhold money. The constitution says so! Since Trump is the only one I know of who is talking of withholding money from sanctuary cities, I don't think it's a coincidence.
Nice job Dryfuss, camouflage your hate for Trump with your sudden love for the constitution.
Sadly you watched twice but missed the part where he actually states he is not into political parties...i.e. -he is not a democrat...
And you believe that ....wow! A Hollywierd liberal says something and a Freeper believes him.......I'm speachless!
Yet you rant and attack both him and me with no basis. just like to see thoughtful, accurate, articulate posts on Free Republic...
Sooooo, you're thoughtful, accurate, and articulate. However, I rant and attack liberals. Never thought I'd see a liberal defended by a Freeper, maybe you should look up the definition of thoughtful, accurate, and articulate.