Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/23/2017 8:02:29 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: nickcarraway

The first Korean War hasn’t ended. Who writes this crap?


58 posted on 04/23/2017 9:36:55 PM PDT by PJBankard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

So I looked at photos and videos of NK recently. One thing that struck me is how many times I saw military who looked gaunt. Few years back I saw pics of Kim visiting some site with what looked like computers or screens of some type that looked as if they were made in the 1950s. I have no doubt he can kill a lot of our troops & South Koreans & Japanese, but wonder if he can do anything even in 4-8 years to the US mainland.


62 posted on 04/23/2017 9:51:44 PM PDT by PghBaldy (12/14 - 930am -rampage begins... 12/15 - 1030am - Obama's advance team scouts photo-op locations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

I read the estimate cost of a US invasion of the Norks would be 250,000 US military casualties plus at least $1 trillion


67 posted on 04/23/2017 10:59:09 PM PDT by vooch (America First)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

“war plan for conflict on the Korean Peninsula purportedly calls for immediate but proportionate retaliation”

Porportionate? It should be overwhelming!


71 posted on 04/24/2017 3:23:07 AM PDT by dynachrome (When an empire dies, you are left with vast monuments in front of which peasants squat to defecate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

One sentence:

Much worse than the first korean war.


72 posted on 04/24/2017 3:37:15 AM PDT by Secret Agent Man ( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

North Korea likely lacks the fuel to make a mechanized thrust down the 2 approaches to Seoul mentioned in the article. Back when Clinton was busy supplying a nuke reactor and diesel fuel to the Pyongyang regime in an effort to buy them off I had read a similar article that stated as much. That article posited a ‘leg’ infantry attack to seize territory in the rugged eastern end of the peninsula. They also assumed a large role for NK’s Special Operations units behind the lines.

So it all depends... Did the NK’s manage to preserve a war stockpile of Clinton’s fuel?


74 posted on 04/24/2017 4:02:20 AM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

In my opinion, Commie diplomat trying to pretend to do military analysis to scare people and protect Lil Kim; utter BS. Yes, damage to Seoul is pretty much unavoidable due to prepositioned artillery, but acting like we don’t know their potential CoAs and won’t take down their C2, log and infrastructure immediately, start hitting HVTs hard, control the airspace /infiltration routes/ Western Corridor, and be able to mass fires anywhere in the battlespace they try to organize forces is living in commie fantasy land. We were ready for this tenfold when I was there decades ago, and since then ROKA has gotten much stronger while they have grown much weaker.


76 posted on 04/24/2017 4:11:36 AM PDT by LambSlave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

How did I come under the impression the US is technically still at was with Korea?


80 posted on 04/24/2017 4:31:24 AM PDT by School of Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Good ting Truman canned MacArthur otherwise we wouldn’t be having all this fun


83 posted on 04/24/2017 5:21:49 AM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Good thing Truman canned MacArthur otherwise we wouldn’t be having all this fun


84 posted on 04/24/2017 5:22:06 AM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

This couldn’t be the second Korean War because the first one hasn’t yet ended. There was never any surrender or peace treaty, only a cease fire. There’s just been a 64-year lull in the hostilities.


87 posted on 04/24/2017 6:56:32 AM PDT by Paal Gulli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

N Korea will finally get to glow at night.


89 posted on 04/24/2017 10:19:28 AM PDT by right way right (May we remain sober over mere men, for God really is our one and only true hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Would not be necessary to speculate if Truman had not fired Macarthur!


90 posted on 04/24/2017 10:31:39 AM PDT by maxwellsmart_agent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

95 posted on 04/24/2017 7:46:48 PM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson