Blunt Hillary Book Contrasts with Journalists' Previous Cheerleading

newsbuters,org ^ | 4/12/17 | P. J Gladnick

[Justaham]

When is the best time to get something written by liberals resembling the truth about a liberal politician? The answer is after, and only after, that liberal politician has lost the final campaign of his or her career. Such is the case with authors Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes who in 2014 wrote a mushy book about Hillary Clinton called HRC. Of course, back then Hillary was looked upon as the heir apparent for the Democrat nomination in 2016 which resulted in a book chock full of cheerleading for the anointed one. This was in sharp contrast to their new book due out on April 18, Shattered: Inside Hillary Clinton's Doomed Campaign, which finally reveals much of the truth about Hillary's character previously hidden by their waving pom-poms in their 2014 book.

[Secret Agent Man]

Working title

The B1tch Is Not Coming Back

[jmaroneps37]

Natie Silver had the nerve to say the media gave Hillary a false sense of inevitability. He was the prime suspect in setting Hillary up with his asinine “Hillary has a 97.4567% chance of winning” or some such other stupid crap.

[cgbg]

It is about time for the cult members aka MSM reporters to stand up and confess:

"The American people hate us and don't trust because we are f___ing liars."

Then, and only then, will I pay attention to any of them.

[publius911]

Blunt Hillary Book Contrasts with Journalists' Previous Cheerleading.

A few days ago the Fat Ugly cow announced that she had no plans to run again for elected office in the future.

Maybe she got a heads up about this book?
Maybe she just decided to take the money and run?

Is there a statute of limitation on treason?

[Opinionated Blowhard]

To paraphrase the quote about George McClellan, even though Hillary brought more money, a better organization, a friendly media and many other logistical advantages to the 2016 campaign, she also brought herself. And that was an advantage for Trump that outweighed all of Hillary’s advantages.

[43north]

This is a great comment from the Newsbusters site by Newshound 24:

“Hear, hear. She had to surround herself with lackeys, toadies and lickspittles to project an air of popularity, but she was a fly-bloated corpse that had to be dragged from place to place for her speeches. No better visual could be made to represent her campaign than on 9/11 when she collapsed into a dead faint and, and her comatose body had to be hurled by guards into the back of an SUV like a sack of garbage.”

I could not have said it better myself.