[freedomjusticeruleoflaw]

Number one: We are at war.
Two: We will be at war for at least another generation.
Three: Trump has just made it LESS likely that we will ultimately lose.

[Alberta's Child]

Four: Uh — whut?

[Aaron0617]

What would Ted Cruz do? Anyone see his thoughts on this action yet?

[vooch]

when did congress declare war ?

until congress declares war “We” are not at war

[Celerity]

“Number one: We are at war.
Two: We will be at war for at least another generation.
Three: Trump has just made it LESS likely that we will ultimately lose.”

This. Speak this over and over.

We have been at war for a while. Only now has a move been made that we recognize as a war action.

Remind people that the US perception of Syria has been clouded by the media’s love of Obama. The truth is, what we’re doing is correct and we have the support of many in the international community.

And Russia doesn’t give a sh!t as long as the pipeline is ok.

[pissant]

Except one little thing. Assad is fighting Isis. Trump’s pledge was to destroy Isis, not Assad.

[Eric Pode of Croydon]

We will be at war for at least another generation

America does not have the stomach for a generation or more of war, and frankly I do not.

This action makes it far more likely that Trump will be succeeded by a pacifist Democrat, then lather, rinse, repeat.

All out war to total victory, or stay the F home.