Disney made a big production of saying there was homosexuality in this movie.
They wanted everyone to know.
So, everyone should focus on homosexuality.
But it should be the real homosexuality....the penis in the anal canal homosexuality......the woman sticking a dildo into the vagina of another woman homosexuality.
Not this baloney of two old homosexuals holding hands by the fireplace.
If you can’t deal with the reality of homosexuality, then don’t come on a conservative website to tell us fairy tales about homosexuality.
Disney trumpeted this as having homosexuality in it.
They, like you, are just too cowardly and duplicitous to portray homosexuality as it really is.
Would you have written this glowing review of a fairy tale on this conservative website if Disney hadn’t trumpeted it as having homosexuality in it?
Nope.
You’re a fraud.
I wrote this precisely to give a fair assessment. I told you exactly what happens. Don’t beat me up for not saying what’s not there.
Graphically depicting heterosexual copulation would have been obscene as well.
My take on the movie:
+ Entertaining, an improvement on the original Disney animated movie in many ways
- Continues in a sort-of-subtle way the current, increasing societal theme of justifying and condoning homosexuality, like (it seems) a majority of Hollywood productions do. It is another on a long slippery slope into moral corruption in that sense.
One has to make choices about whether or not to support those who push that subtle agenda when deciding about entertainment options.
I obviously went to this one - at my wife’s urging - and enjoyed the entertainment value. Upon reflection, however, I probably could have made a better choice, given the bigger context, seeing this as one more means for advancing an agenda to which I am opposed.