>Flynn, a Democrat, didn’t level with Pence during their interview. How can you stand by a person who wasn’t forthcoming in a one-on-one with the rep of his future boss?
Because letting Flynn go led directly to this as most of us thought it would. All that should have been done is Trump telling Flynn not to do it again as nothing improper happened beyond the omission.
If he’s not an honest man, how could they know he hadn’t already done it again? I.e.: if you can’t take him at his word, how do you know he only misled the interviewer once in the initial questioning?
Because letting Flynn go led directly to this as most of us thought it would. All that should have been done is Trump telling Flynn not to do it again as nothing improper happened beyond the omission.
************************************************************
You could not be more wrong. Allowing Flynn to stay would have meant blaring headlines each time his name came up regarding his position in the Administration. Any “event”, any statement by him on any subject would have been cause for the media to again bring up his “lie” to the VP and ask the question, “how can anyone be sure he is not lying again”
He had to go.