ping!
I have no training in any of the sciences.However,I’ve read more than once that the earth’s orbit around the sun has inconsistencies (at least small ones).If that is,in fact,true it’s easy even for an amateur like myself to see how such fluctuations might effect earth temperatures.
Ping.
“Where and how much solar radiation a planet gets is a key driver of climate”
Not true. Everyone knows it’s caused by manmade pollution.
Things warmed up because neanderthals were not smart enough to put emission controls in their vehicles.
And wooly mammoths could not fit in small, reasonably sized cattle carriers.
Remember, many scientists claimed that due to the fact most of Earth's continents were on the southern part of the planet 500 to 300 million years ago, Earth was actually encased in ice possibly as high as a mile thick! But volcanic activity and the shifting continents changed the ocean stream patterns, and that melted the ice to create our modern oceans.
Someone has evidence of the "spirograph" nature of elliptical, precessing orbits (although I would throw in Earth's satellite: the Moon as well as the planets).
No climate scientist to my knowledge properly included these data into the Anthropogenic Climate Change models.
Good name for an imaginary singer; Rock Strata, wearing a leopard skin toga.
A character in the Flintstones cartoons.
The gravitational and electromagnetic forces of each of the bodies in the solar system have some affect on all the others, even when only indirectly. The “arrangement” and behavior of the solar system, and any of its bodies, at any time, is a result of the dynamics of the entire system. That should never have been a mystery to modern earth scientists.
Sounds like they may be geographically challenged.
“sedimentary rock in Colorado”
“Alternating layers of shale and limestone near Big Bend, Texas, characteristic of the rock laid down at the bottom of a shallow ocean during the late Cretaceous period.”
Well, Colorado, Texas. What difference does it make. They are both just flyover country.
Really? The strength of the gravitational force from Mars is incredibly small. How can they realistically justify some kind of resonance condition? I say this is fake science!
What? You mean changing weather is a fully NATURAL phenomenon over which man has almost no impact?
Gee, who would have guessed.
Great to see that confirmed through discoveries such as this, but I just rabidly can’t wait to see the HOAX of anthropogenic global warming theory severely debunked, and the sooner the better!
So....Velikovsky was right, but for the wrong reasons?
CHAOS Happens.
ping