On the one hand, we have the children who were brought here with their illegally-entered parents. What do we do with the parents once we let the unemancipated children stay?
On the other hand, we have the children who were sent here alone by their parents, with the "dream" that the parents will get to join them once the illegally-entered children are settled here by law.
"Dreamers" is really backdoor amnesty for the parents.
-PJ
I think you nailed it.
I prefer getting rid of all of them.
I’m in favor of LEGAL immigration. With preference given to those who are an asset to the country. (NOT an asset to a political party or to particular businesses)
Also, we need a law that ends the “anchor baby” enticement. To be a citizen, it should no longer be enough that you are born here. You must be born here to citizen parents.
PARENTS GO dreamers will not stay without parents, it’s all in the plan!!! What the HELL parents leave their kids behind!!! This WILL ALL BE SOLVED when the jobs and benefits DRY UP!!!!
Good post...............
One Dreamer is an anchor for the ENTIRE Mexico nation,
because everybody is 6 degrees of separation.
“Dreamers” is really backdoor amnesty for the parents.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Agreed. That being said, I’ve heard Rush make no such statement. He’s elaborated on the precise dilema.
He’s also described the GOPe’s relentless charge for immigration “reform” —aka Amnesty. Seems many in the GOPe need to be primaried.
Yep. Many of them have lied about their age as well. But Dreamers and the parents of anchor babies being allowed to stay is not only a couple million illegals and Democrat voters that we don’t need, but a massive incentive for the rest of the third-world to get here come hell or high water.
Do you have any idea how many “dreamers” are in the U.S? Honest question. I do not know.
I would assume that we know who these people are...no?
Or are these just a class of people that fit in to a category and we do not know who they are. Please help.