Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: NTHockey

And from what I have read, it was done for cheapness sake. All the surrounding buildings were dug down to solid ground, but this much higher building only went down half as much as they should have to hit a solid base. So I think maybe the architect, and the construction outfit are the ones at fault. But they would soon go bankrupt so who would foot the bill. Maybe insurers?


87 posted on 02/01/2017 6:36:44 PM PST by kiltie65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: kiltie65

Shouldn’t there be criminal liability?


88 posted on 02/02/2017 3:55:25 AM PST by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners. And to the NSA trolls, FU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson