Stop making false accusations. I have a great deal of respect for Founders Original intent. That you and I understand it differently is not the same thing as my having no respect for it.
Here he claims that his own interpretations of "Natural Law" must trump Founders' Original Intent wherever some conflict appears evident to DiogenesLamp.
And what the H3ll are you talking about here? I don't even know where you are trying to go with this claim. My understanding of natural law and that of the founders appears to me to be exactly the same.
Read some James Otis for crying out loud.
False. You have frequently claimed or implied that your own interpretations of "Natural Law" must trump whatever Founders expressed or did as to their Original Intentions.
DiogenesLamp: "My understanding of natural law and that of the founders appears to me to be exactly the same."
That's because you refuse to read what they actually said & did, insisting instead that your own understandings of "Natural Law" must be what they believed.