Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Rusty0604
I'd be okay with anyone who chose not to get catastrophic (or other for that matter) health insurance having a rule that if they decided to buy it later, coverage wouldn't be until two years after payments began. That would protect us all from the freeloaders who would wait until they're sick to sign up, then expect immediate coverage.

I'm not being a hypocrite here. I have Medicare Part A but opted out of everything else.

104 posted on 01/16/2017 8:09:43 AM PST by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]


To: grania

Yea, the libs were complaining that people had to file bankruptcy because of unexpected medical bills. Well, if they had enough to lose to even file for bankruptcy they should have had catastrophic insurance in the first place. In that case, don’t include medical bills in bankruptcy just like school loans.


119 posted on 01/16/2017 8:36:08 AM PST by Rusty0604 (bc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson