Incorrect. It has been known by any number of people that snopes was unreliable especially when it comes to political items.
You appear to be singling out this one reporter
I "singled out" this reporter because he is the one who wrote the article.
Should I have singled out his next door neighbor?
Sheesh!
And I am pointing out that this is something that anyone who did a small amount of digging knew years ago.
Using snopes as a fact check is like using Wikipedia for research. In both cases you are taking the word of people about which you know nothing.
As a starting place it is fine, but not as the source of all truth.
Like I said before he gets a small pat for suddenly noticing the work someone else did and deciding to fact check it.
He gets a kick for being naive for so long.
how about singling out the 5000 other media outlets and 50000 other reporters?
Actual reviews of Wikipedia shows it to be reliable. I often use it as a starting point.