[pepsi_junkie]

I am sure Levin blasted him. Maybe he deserved it, maybe not. The problem is, I no longer trust Levin's judgement when it comes to anything Trump related. He ripped Trump at every turn all through the election until a few weeks before, then "supported" him in a grudging and halfhearted way (i.e. "look, he's not a conservative and populism is a disaster but we can't have Hillary in... yadda yadda yadda"), always with that caveat that Trump's not good but he's not as bad as Hillary.

Then when it was all over, he had the chutzpah to start talking about HE was going to hold Trump's feet to the fire and make demands. I tuned him out most of the time but heard enough. I just don't trust Levin to be objective regarding anything Trump says or does, frankly.

[hotsteppa]

“I just don’t trust Levin to be objective regarding anything Trump says or does, frankly”.

Exactly and that’s the point. His bias comes through in ever analysis he makes about Trump. Why should we listen to him? I certainly don’t anymore. For the first time, I would rather trust the President than the pundits. Trump has earned that trust frankly. He is open about who he is and owns up to anything he says. I respect that.

[nikos1121]

Does Hannity still take this guy seriously? REmember, he was “The Great ONe.” Levin is a joke. Almost as bad as the idiot Glenn Beck.

[databoss]

Levin thought he could be head cheerleader of Reagan Revolution II through the unelectable Ted Cruz. Trump had and has a plan and it is new and different, like Reagan was new and different. Levin just can’t wrap his brain around it because he looks at everything through the prism of his Reagan experience. That worked then not going to work now.