https://twitter.com/marklevinshow/status/801564843224498177
--------
La Flama Blanca @Caseyatthebat1
@marklevinshow I'm surprised to see you entertaining this alt-right nonsense. Of 62M Trump voters maybe 0.1% are what MSM calls alt-right
Sense Gone Wild @sensegonewild 20m20 minutes ago Woburn, MA
@marklevinshow Falling into the "ALT RIGHT" BS . No1 ever heard of that until 2 mins ago & you R perpetuating the BS. Dems got you twisted
Jay Keil @RoczRed 22m22 minutes ago
@marklevinshow ..What is an alternative right made up word crowd? That didn't even exist until this campaign.....JUNK
FUMark
Unicorn herds are dangerous too. (Not that many of them though)
Thanks Mark for all your help we’ll take it from here!
Hey Mark, the Alt Right is not killing Police every week like BLM....go after BLM.
Classic Alinsky. Label, isolate and demonize. I personally know some very nice people who people like Levin would label alt-right. 99% of the people on Reddit The Donald are not racists and many are black, Jewish, etc.
The Alt.Levin crowd are one face in a bowl of Cheetos away from being as lunatic as the Alt.Glenn.Stabby.Beck crowd.
But not nearly as dangerous as Mark Levin and his ilk. That assho*e and his friends almost caused Trump to lose the election to a stinking criminal. And if I ever get the opportunity to call him on that to his face, I will damn sure do so.
Levin joins the MSM.
The “KKK and ilk” are way more dangerous than a loser in a monogramed jacket trying to sabotage the Trump campaign on his national radio show.
If Hillary had won (because Cruz would have lost), then levin could be our “voice”.
Levine ratings stay up, as well as his income...because he could rail against Hillary and talk about the Constitution to a depressed electorate.
But Trump won.....what's a pundit to do? Well, they must create a problem.
Suck it Levin...I ain't buying.
I don’t I even heard of alt-right until a week ago.
Who are they? What are they about? Who is their leader?
Major team members?
Weird crap
Kristol and Galston: In Defense of Liberal Democracy
A joint statement.
9:45 AM, Nov 29, 2016
http://www.weeklystandard.com/kristol-and-galston-in-defense-of-liberal-democracy/article/2005580
In a joint statement, Brookings Institution scholar William Galston and WEEKLY STANDARD editor Bill Kristol offer a defense of the “basic institutions and principles of liberal democracy” which they argue are under assault. Read the full statement below:
The authors of this statement do not make an obvious team. Over the past four decades we have never voted for the same presidential candidate. We’ve worked in White Houses of different parties. One of us was a senior aide to a presidential candidate who sought to replace the president the other worked for.
We’ve differed on major policy issues. One of us vigorously backed the war in Iraq; the other just as vigorously opposed it. We’ve publicly debated many times, usually focusing on our differences. These disagreements persist.
(Snip)
And we stand together against an alternative right disdainful of the traditions of American conservatism and a vocal left that blends socialist economics with identity politics. We stand together against a dangerous impatience with the legal forms and constitutional constraints that are guarantors of our liberty. We stand together in defense of an open, generous liberal democracy as the strongest foundation for addressing the very real challenges that we face and the legitimate frustrations with the status quo that we feel.
(Snip)
Oh yes good old Mark
Born with his you’re a Nazi card
Screw him