To: C19fan
Regular cycles of dimming can be due to a large planet or dark companion star passing between the star and the telescope. But that theory would not tend to justify more grants to “study” it...
4 posted on
10/26/2016 10:38:57 AM PDT by
JimRed
(Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
To: JimRed
....or a fly on the lens................
15 posted on
10/26/2016 11:05:47 AM PDT by
Red Badger
(WhereÂ’s that VIDEO the Anonymous group promised us????????????)
To: JimRed
The cycles of dimming are neither regular nor predictable.
17 posted on
10/26/2016 11:21:25 AM PDT by
mcshot
(The "Greatest Generation" would never have allowed the trashing of our Republic.)
To: JimRed
Yes, that’s sensible.
Except that the pattern of occlusion has to fit within certain physical limits, which apparently this pattern isn’t.
... Unless it’s artificial, which this pattern suggests it is.
25 posted on
10/26/2016 11:47:01 AM PDT by
ctdonath2
("If anyone will not listen to your words, shake the dust from your feet and leave them." - Jesus)
To: JimRed
If there’s more than one dark companion in different orbits it would make for more irregular cycles.
26 posted on
10/26/2016 11:52:59 AM PDT by
piasa
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson