Posted on 10/19/2016 8:50:44 PM PDT by fuzzylogic
I've never posted a vanity thread...but Hillary was READING something. She keeps looking down for the entire debate. Trump looks at the camera, the moderator and Hillary. While Trump is talking she's reading...yes, she takes a few notes, but not a thousand page essay and EVERY time she's talking she's looking down at something giving her info. Look again and you'll see it.
Amen.
I noticed her reading too.
Yep she was.
I thought the same thing; at times it looked like she was reading a teleprompter.
I made the comment to my sister while we watched that it seemed like she was reading.
At debate #2 Hillary had what looked awfully like a teleprompter n her podium. I am sure whatever advantages she had then were there for the 3rd debate.
She sure came across as an automaton.
A demon-possessed automaton.
Using mathematics cancelling rules she becomes a demon, just sayin
Noticed that too.
She obviously had prepared answers.
Her answers were way too robotic, and scripted to have been an actual spontaneous response. The only time she looked thrown off a bit is when Wallace asked her about pay for play and her statement about open borders. Once asked those questions, she resorted to lying and saying that it was only open borders for energy, sort of like her blaming her lies on Lincoln in the 2nd debate. Wallace let her filibuster the pay for play question by letting her blather on and on about the greatness of the Clinton Foundation.
She always does that and never gets called on it.
No doubt, it’s suggested responses from Begala or Derchowitz.
If so, I wonder why Trump hasn’t called her on it?
She sounded like she had the questions ahead of time.
She was reading notes. Notes that were not updated as exemplified by her flubbing the “Trump promotes violence at his rallies” prepared line.
She knew the questions in advance and had the answered in front of her. At the end Wallace said “neither of you knew about this question”.
And all the sheeple said “Wow! She didn’t have the questions in advance!”
Yes but I feel her answers were too detailed, if you watch a second time and watch her nodding and looking down at the podium it is obvious she’s reading more than she could have written notes about.
Notes. She was reading notes.
C’mon.
They are not allowed to take prior notes to the stage. This is the point...watch again how long she ALWAYS looks down for prolonged periods, there’s no way she took so many “notes” to the point of being able to re-read her own “notes”. Watch again, the time she spends READING is not proportional to the time she could have written words. Not....even....close.
I made a similar comment during the last debate.
That’s more than just glancing at her “notes”.
I told my wife the same thing. You could see her looking down, then up, then down again.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.