Posted on 10/19/2016 8:35:08 PM PDT by Rusty0604
I don't know if this is allowed, but it is a vanity. This is one of a few things I would like to vent about: I keep hearing from Hillary and a lot of women that Trump is insulting his women accusers by saying "look at her" and "that wouldn't be my first choice". I am a woman, and I can tell you that, whenever I have said that about a man or woman under any circumstance, I was NOT referring to physical appearance but the person as a whole. I'm getting sick and tired of hearing this. When you look at a person, you are looking at a lot of things.
And because he resigned that proves it was true. Why don’t they admit that?
That was my point exactly: no one would have thought anything of it if he’d said “Such a nasty man” to a male opponent.
The media are already playing the “female” card, though.
I’ll pay, but I’m trying to conserve space by consolidating vanities into one. I figured if open line Fridays works for Rush why not open vent vanities for Free Republic?
In response to statements about Russian hackers:
If somebody would use the secure government provided computer servers and follow the cyber-security procedures already in place, maybe Russia wouldn’t be able to steal so many emails.
Very good analysis.
Hillary was getting angry, saying it is a fact that the Russian government was responsible, but in fact it hasn’t been proven. Also, does that change the validity of the material that wS leaked? No.
Actually, I lived in those times as an attractive woman with brains making it in the corporate world. Guess what? I made it without sleeping with or suing any of the men I worked with. These weak women give women’s rights a bad name. A lot of the women I worked with were more evil than the men.
1) Remember during the 2008 campaign where they had Tina Fey make fun of Sarah Palin, saying ...and I can see Russia from my house? (and many Democrats to this day still believe Palin really said that). And then during the 2012 campaign, the line against Romney was, The 1980s called, they want their foreign policy back ? Why is it the Dems are blaming Wikileaks on RUSSIAN hackers? 2) And, if the Russians DID hack the servers, the Dems are admitting that Hillarys private server DID make us less safe. How can they protect us from anything else if they cant even guard their own illegal conduct, even by using a secret hush-hush clandestine server? 3) And if it really WAS the Russians, why did Assanges Internet have to get cut? That wouldnt stop Putin or whatever he re-named the KGB, would it? The Russians can see EVERYTHING from my server!
This woman agrees. “Look at them” means the creepy scale.
Megyn just couldn’t let the subject die. She was on and on and on and on about it. No, Megyn, he did not know those women. You don’t know the person sitting next to you on a plane. You don’t know a person who two seconds earlier introduced themselves. You don’t know every single beauty contestant. Just because a waitperson says, “Hi, I’m Janet and I’ll be your server today.” Ok, fine, her name is Janet but you do not know her.
Megyn was acting like a little 15 year old who was snubbed by the quarterback. She needs to get over herself.
Hellary wants to be treated equally to a man but when she is, she and her minions can’t take it.
Exactly. If there wasn’t voter fraud and cheating, then what’s with all the tapes? What’s with Indiana filing suit today over all the dead voters? What’s with all the arguing about voter ID? Uh, helloooo, because there IS voter fraud. And that is exactly why Wallace asked the question. If there truly weren’t fraud, then Wallace wouldn’t have brought the subject up.
I worked with a guy that actually got mad and threw something because I pointed out that Tina Fey and not Sara Palin said that.
I worked with a guy that actually got mad and threw something because I pointed out that Tina Fey and not Sara Palin said that.
Indiana has noticed 42,000 Bureau of Motor Vehicle records with names and/or addresses wrong, (notified by real citizens), and has called in the State Police to help with the investigation.
Have you never said look at him or her as in look at their lifestyle, work, family of personal life?
They all think we have forgotten 2000 and the attempt by the Democrats to steal the election.
Men routinely say that like or dislike the looks of other men. It doesn't mean the man is handsome or ugly, it means he looks sneaky or honest or whatever. Men say that about women, too, newsflash, and for the same reasons. But Trump, for what ever reason, can't say, for instance, look at that women, because he must be talking about her physical attractiveness. That is so elitist and so double standard and so feminist. I am glad you called her on it.
On this issue, I think the real truth is that Donald Trump is just babbling in celebrity mode when he should turn the page and stop “mansplaining” what he may or may not have done. I think most people get this more than the media may think, Hollywood is not the real world and celebtrity status in general warps the fabric of human interaction.
My guess is that these stories are an eclectic mixture of fantasy, hyperbole, truth about lack of impulse control, and delusion. They probably form no organized or coherent set, other than a rush to publicity in the politicized hope of derailing a campaign.
The problem is that we have to choose between one person who we know is dangerous and unsuitable, and another person who is perhaps flawed or at least was flawed ten years or more ago. There isn’t some third choice, unless God plans to have the second coming between now and November 8th.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.