To: glennherman
If this is what Drudge has been hinting at, and Larry Nichols is the source, this will not have any impact at all and will be ignored. Completely. Larry has been peddling this for 20 years and has never got any traction at all. He’s a nut, too. Sorry — I happen to think all of it or at least some of it is true. But he has NO CRED AT ALL.
To: 2big2fail
Is Larry Nichols the source?
108 posted on
10/18/2016 12:59:17 PM PDT by
kabar
To: 2big2fail
If this is what Drudge has been hinting at, and Larry Nichols is the source, this will not have any impact at all and will be ignored. Completely. Larry has been peddling this for 20 years and has never got any traction at all. He’s a nut, too. Sorry — I happen to think all of it or at least some of it is true. But he has NO CRED AT ALL.Not so sure you're correct about creds. He may be old news to those of us who have been around for a few years, but most people either didn't know about him at the time or have forgotten about him.
124 posted on
10/18/2016 1:15:18 PM PDT by
BlueCat
To: 2big2fail
I don’t think Larry Nichols qualifies as a “Hollywood Fixer.”
131 posted on
10/18/2016 1:28:13 PM PDT by
FredZarguna
(And what Rough Beast, its hour come round at last, slouches toward Fifth Avenue to be born?)
To: 2big2fail
Was Larry around in the mid 90’s? I thought he did his dirty work while the Clintons were in Arkansas.
140 posted on
10/18/2016 1:38:30 PM PDT by
surrey
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson