Insufficient evidence for any such claim as far as Scalia goes. The email said nor implied any such thing.
Agreed that it is too indefinite to be the basis for an accusation. But, it would be sufficient for an honest media to query Podesta on just what he did mean & understand was being communicated. Ask the questions, do not rush to conclusions. The Socratic method is respectable among all rational people. Rushing to judgment is not! (Even when one suspects the foulest of foul play!)