More of this? Flame me but Bundy led or participated in armed insurrection and is now exactly where he belongs. BTW, has he accepted jurisdiction of the US yet? Personally, until he accepts the jurisdiction of the US and our laws, he has no rights to demand anything whatsoever.
How do you have that view? You are fine with the federal government steam rolling families on twisted logic from a terroistic bill from 1996?...The hammonds were prosecuted on a controlled burn that burned some F kin grass on a fed . piece of soil?...Then they get RE-sentenced ...are you all there?...Do you know all of what the suck off federal employee union slugs did via orders from some other bought off hack boss?...w t f?
You again? The smell of jackboot is STRONG with this one.
"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen." - Samuel Adams
He carries a copy of the Constitution of the United States of America in his pocket.
Which laws do you follow?
When the courts are bought and paid for by the enemy, what recourse is there? But the armed insurrection should have been by taking out THOSE WHO GIVE THE ORDERS from ambush, or causing them to have "accidents", or to just disappear.
Look I know you are the walking dumb on these threads but what part of vested rights and patent claims don’t you get? Apparently you dont get any of it.
The US government is breaking the law not the ranchers and miners. These kangaroo courts are what the govt does to people who sqwuack about getting screwed out of their legal rights.
Head back over to HuffPo where you probably sound like you have a clue.