Oh Swordmaker, so SO predictable! When you're caught flatfooted, you shout "LIAR!" and call out your troops...
Latest data on the Pixel XL and the iPhone 7 plus. Your dimensions you post are wrong (perhaps - LYING?). The iPhone 7 Plus is 90cc; the Pixel XL is 85cc.
Sorry - you're wrong. The Pixel XL is smaller, and has the same size (and higher resolution!) screen than the iPhone. Of course iPhones are really known for their wasted space at the top and bottom (all forehead and jaw).
Oh - and I like how you COMPLETELY ignored the schooling I gave you on battery size and packing. Engineering and physics and stuff. Silence there once the facts are shown, eh?
I guess I could pull a Swordmaker and shout "LIAR!" or I can sit back and relish in the fact you were proven completely wrong - and you are not man enough to admit it.
The iPhone comes up short. Too big, not enough battery, too small a screen (with really low resolution to boot).
Oh Swordmaker, so SO predictable! When you're caught flatfooted, you shout "LIAR!" and call out your troops... Latest data on the Pixel XL and the iPhone 7 plus. Your dimensions you post are wrong (perhaps - LYING?). The iPhone 7 Plus is 90cc; the Pixel XL is 85cc. This was my source of the dimensions of the Google Pixel XL. . . And was accurate as of the date of my posting.
GSMArena
That's a difference of 9,578.121 cubic millimeters.
So you found a newer article published ONE HOUR AGO with a new spec sheet and come on here to attack me. Good form. So HTC, who is building the Pixel for Google has somehow thinned down the spec a bit. Good for them! Whoopee Duck, thinner plastic.