Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: mrsmith

This one took about three seconds to find:

http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/09/29/hillary-clinton-conspiracy-theories-swirl-after-first-presidential-debate

We really should focus on beating Hillary. Trying to catch her cheating is not going to do anything but frustrate you.


65 posted on 10/03/2016 6:02:36 PM PDT by Vermont Lt (Brace. Brace. Brace. Heads down. Do not look up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: Vermont Lt

I’ll tell you when a Conspiracy is real or not.

When the Uniparty COLLUDES AND CONSPIRES to trounce Trump at the debate by using illegal tactics.

Now, if your entire reason for being here is to make fun of the rest of us, disprove what our lying eyes are telling us.

ADDRESS THE EVIDENCE ON THE VIDEO.


69 posted on 10/03/2016 6:09:25 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

To: Vermont Lt; All

Would like to know what search terms you used.
That’s the kind of stuff I wanted, thanks!
(His behavior to Holt is still weird IMO)

Using “Brady Williamson” brings up a Conservative Treehouse ‘Cleaner Part 3’ that may be reassuring to the most doubtful:
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2016/09/29/the-cleaner-part-iii-more-perspectives/

Yes, and Wikileaks isn’t going to save us from her either. We have to do it with a winning campaign.


73 posted on 10/03/2016 6:15:25 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

To: Vermont Lt

Its time to apologize for your “debunking lie” or GTFO. You have squat. The Ed Henry video you linked supports your premise = zero. Nothing more than Foxbots ridiculing the theories without a single fact other than the identity of the cleaner (which actually supports the theories).

Now man up or zot yourself.


109 posted on 10/03/2016 10:14:24 PM PDT by anton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

To: Vermont Lt; Fred Nerks
This one took about three seconds to find:

http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/09/29/hillary-clinton-conspiracy-theories-swirl-after-first-presidential-debate

We really should focus on beating Hillary. Trying to catch her cheating is not going to do anything but frustrate you.

THAT'S your rebuttal to this video about the podium?!?!?

You're more off the deep end than I thought! Those two idiots were claiming the crooked wire running up Hillary's back looked like her spine and the box it connected to could be just "something in her pocket." No mention of the TelePrompTer screen on her podium at all, or the very real evidence for it. They were ridiculing even the possibility that there could be anything to it. . . and we're even OK with the idea of there being an earpiece attached to it! I actually think the wire on her back and the box are more likely part of the wireless lapel mike both candidates were seen wearing, but that does not mean there could not also have been a contact speaker attached to it as well, pasted behind her ear. Frankly, at this point, I don't trust NBC which would have supplied the mike equipment as they supplied the podium.

However, Vermont Lt, you've just proven without a doubt you had no evidence that the TelePrompTer in the podium had been debunked at all when you made the claim. You lied!

113 posted on 10/04/2016 2:27:47 AM PDT by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

To: Vermont Lt

See post 119


120 posted on 10/04/2016 7:44:25 AM PDT by TruthWillWin (The problem with socialists is that you eventually run out of other peoples money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson