What Does Matt Drudge Know About the Bill Clinton "Love Child" Story That We Don't?

Independent Journal Review ^ | 10/03/2016 | Justin Green

[Rusty0604]

This morning's Drudge Report leads with what looks like a brutal story for Bill Clinton, who isn't running for President.

The story links to the Facebook page of Danney Williams, who claims to be the child of former President Bill Clinton. His Facebook page includes the following picture:

Williams first came to the scene in 1992, when a tabloid published a story alleging Clinton's paternity. In 1999, a paternity test proved that Clinton was not the father, as the conservative publication Accuracy in Media recounts:

A claim by Bobbie Ann Williams, a Little Rock prostitute, that her son, Danny, was fathered by Bill Clinton has been proven false by DNA analysis. Star, the tabloid that first published Gennifer Flowers' claim that she had been one of Clinton's lovers, was reported to have paid Williams “a low six-figure” sum for exclusive rights to the story. It arranged to have Danny's DNA checked against that of the President.

Drudge then links to a video from Infowars, where Trump adviser Roger Stone has a whopper of a claim: the paternity test doesn't exist:

But now for the two weird bits:

1) The original site to break the news of the paternity test? The Drudge Report

Drudge is renowned for being a fresh source of news, and he's usually loathe to put stale content on his site. During October before Election Day, the homepage of the conservative internet has a lead story hinging on a Facebook page that's been up for some time, and using source material of a video that InfoWars published in January.

So, that presents the obvious question.

What does Matt Drudge know that we don't?

[Yaelle]

2) It could have Hillary dismissing it, by saying something like - “that’s all bunk, Bills been shooting blanks since he was a teenager!”. That would show that Hillary, and Bill both have always known that Chelsea could not be Bill’s daughter.

---

This one isn’t going to hurt Hillary. There are thousand of Americans who have become parents using donor gametes. There is nothing shameful about it. It’s a wonderful way to create a family. These people are all lawyers so no doubt drew up all the right documents and contracts, and, yes, Bill is Chelsea’s father. Genetics don’t matter in parenting. Ask any adoptive parent.

[burghguy]

Just a guess, but the word is that there is a video of Hillary speaking disparagingly about African Americans. Perhaps she said something about Bill’s love child and Drudge is just setting the table for this to come out. Popcorn. I need lots of Popcorn.

[sockhead]

The Alex Jones story the Drudge report linked to suggested ‘illary had the kid banished. That’s a story, or it would be if it weren’t from Alex Jones.

Maybe this Drudge's response to Hillary's speech this weekend in which she said that she doesn't have the same concerns as a black grandmother.

Or, Drudge has been kidnapped and someone is forcing him to post about this topic. ;-)

[kabar]

Anyone paying attention already knows that Clinton Foundationw as a pay for play and the DOJ and FBI are letting her off... a smoking gun isn’t going to change anything... Obama will grant a pardon on his way out the door.

We will just agree to disagree. If Assange provides undisputed evidence of a crime, there will be consequences for the election. An Obama pardon is really irrelevant.

We shall see, but how many election cycles I have been through, anyone with huge claims about revelations are almost always nothing.... we will see.

I am only 73, so I am sure you have been thru many more than I have. I do remember how Bush's DUI report almost cost him the election. Thomas Eagleton had to drop out as the VP nominee because of his bouts of severe depression. Kerry was hurt by the Swift Boat vets and the book, "unfit for Command."

I am hard pressed to think of what could be in them that anyone is going to massively change their mind over... no matter how bad it is.. Press runs interference and a Hillary supporter isn’t going to care.. if they don’t care about her criminality to date, aren’t going to care about some more.

It is not only about changing someone's mind, it is about depressing turnout.

[Meet the New Boss]

After Clinton raped Juanita Broaddrick, he told her not to worry about getting pregnant because a bout with the mumps had left him sterile.

Gennifer Flowers said Clinton told her he had a “fertility problem.”

Dolly Kyle Browing said when she confronted him about not using a condom, that he said “nobody should worry about my getting them pregnant.”

http://www.weeklystandard.com/a-case-of-the-mumps/article/11498

It is possible that a disease left him with a very low sperm count, and the law of averages caught up with him with Danney.

[jonrick46]

If Slick Willy has produced a “love child,” why is it that he has never produced another child with der Hildebeast? There are people that doubt that der Slickmeister never produced Chelsea; that is was Hillary’s Rose Law Firm partner Webb Hubbell who fathered the Clinton’s only child.

It would be a bombshell if, in the next debate, Trump questions Chelsea’s true fatherhood with the conspiracy theories swirling around the question.

[IWONDR]

“I stopped visiting his site when he was pro-Romney in 2012, but I returned.”

and how has Obama’s presidency worked out for you and all the others on FR who wouldn’t support Romney?

[TakebackGOP]

“I stopped visiting his site when he was pro-Romney in 2012, but I returned.”

and how has Obama’s presidency worked out for you and all the others on FR who wouldn’t support Romney?”

I voted for him. During the primary against Gingrich his site was anti-Newt.

[HamiltonJay]

Trying to compare a DUI revelation about Bush, to yet another revelation or criminal behavior about Hillary is a bit of a stretch.

Everyone, even Hillary’s own supporters know she’s a liar and a criminal, and they don’t care... so another revelation about her criminal behavior isn’t likely to sway them. Hillary’s illegal and immoral behavior are well known, so I really don’t see any revelation or smoking gun having any major impact... We will see.

I see this election this way... Hillary has her support, and its all she can get... its about 42/43% of the population, that’s it.. .nothing she says or does will get more than that to vote for her.. .election day 60M votes is probably the best she could possibly do.

The rest of the population has written her off, and are simply trying to decide can they support Trump or will they stay home or vote third party. Another revelation about Hillary might influence those still looking for a reason to vote Trump to do so... but it won’t have any measurable impact on her turnout or voters.... They know she’s a crook and just don’t care.

Trump has this thing in the bag either way, and if he has something by all means out with it, but as to being some huge tectonic shift to the race, I highly doubt it, regardless of what it is.

Hillary has taken bribes to sell weapons to and uranium... all documented, all publicly known, she’s basically a traitor... but those voting for her are going to anyway. I really don’t see any new revelation changing it.. the FBI has already admitted she broke the law but won’t prosecute her, and no matter what new evidence turns up showing they should they won’t do it.

Trump has this won already, just as long as he doesn’t do anything stupid, as long as he looks reasonable he will continue to gain support and broaden his lead. While I welcome any revelation WIKI might have, I really doubt you are going to see anything fundamentally change the dynamics of the race coming out about Clinton.. her supporters already know she’s a crooked corrupt shill, and just don’t care.

[sanjuanbob]

“Just like the nothing-burger tax fraud implications the media are trying to foment with Trump’s 1995 tax report (what I heard was a STATE tax form)”

---

Is there any law broken when a newspaper publishes a tax return without approval? I thought people had privacy.

[sport]

I believe that there is a Federal law against that. But guess who is in charge of enforcing the law? And what are the odds that they would prosecute anyone releasing the tax records of one of their political enemies?

And if you think it is bad now, wait until Hillary gets into the White House.

[IWONDR]

i too was a newt supporter during the primaries.

[tennmountainman]

Of course, that dress would be a good source to test depending on if there is any stains left to test after Ken Starr tested it and depending on the condition of the dress on how it’s been stored.
Of course, if one could get that test on the dress done and compare to
the young man’s DNA, and it was Slick Willie’s DNA, one could file a lawsuit
for a formal DNA test from Slick Willie.
However, without a DNA test it really does not matter what this kid says.

[kabar]

Trying to compare a DUI revelation about Bush, to yet another revelation or criminal behavior about Hillary is a bit of a stretch.

You missed my point in response to your assertion that any new revelations about Hillary would have no appreciable effect on the election and that historically, revelations about candidates don't have any real impact. You cited your many years of observing elections.

I see this election this way... Hillary has her support, and its all she can get... its about 42/43% of the population, that’s it.. .nothing she says or does will get more than that to vote for her.. .election day 60M votes is probably the best she could possibly do.

McCain and Romney got 60 million and 61 million respectively. Hillary will do better given the Dems very effective GOV efforts. Obama got 69 million and 66 million, the two highest totals in US history. Hillary will get at least 65 million.

Trump has this thing in the bag either way, and if he has something by all means out with it, but as to being some huge tectonic shift to the race, I highly doubt it, regardless of what it is.

Sorry, but Trump is going to have a hard slog. It remains to be seen what his ceiling is. And then there is voter fraud. The Dems steal elections year after year. The big cities manufacture the votes the Dems need to win. As someone who done duty many times as an election officer or a poll watcher, we need to have our people in these cities along with plenty of lawyers, like the Dems always have, ready to jump in.

Hillary has taken bribes to sell weapons to and uranium... all documented, all publicly known,

Documented by whom and how well is it known to the LIV. Only 41% of the people according to a Fox poll even know the names of the VP candidates.

Trump has this won already, just as long as he doesn’t do anything stupid, as long as he looks reasonable he will continue to gain support and broaden his lead.

I wish I could share your optimism, but I know too well from personal experience and as a political science major including graduate school that the Dems have built a formidable political machine. And couple that with the rapidly changing demographics of this country fueled by mass immigration and high minority birth rates, the Dems are on the cusp of becoming the permanent majority party. Demography is destiny.

[CodeJockey]

From the Clintons’ War on Women.

Clinton, then the governor of Arkansas, was out for a jog one day in 1984 in Little Rock when he met Bobbie Ann Williams (sometimes spelled Bobbi or Bobby), a 24-year-old prostitute, at a housing project.

A few days later, Clinton jogged by again, but this time he solicited Williams for sex behind some bushes for $200.

[HamiltonJay]

Guess we’ll see who’s right a month from now... Given every prediction regarding Trump has been wrong to date by the pundits, I hold little belief that the standard arguments apply.

Obama has huge enthusiasm, that Hillary does not have... 65 M votes on Election Day for her is wishful thinking. She has nowhere near the support, enthusiasm or anything else to be close to Obama’s 12 numbers.

Evaluating this election through the lense of recent modern elections is simply refusing to see that this is a disruptive cycle... Something that hasn’t happened in US politics at the national level in a long long time.

If you think 2016 will be anything like 2012 you are showing a bias toward what was over what is. Comparing 2016 to 2012 is a false premise from the get go.

Let’s take one state shall we? PA for example. 2008. I got just shy of 3.3M votes.. 12 just shy of 3M. R got 2.65 and 2.68 respectively. So with dud candidates R can put 2.7 in the box without trying.

Hillary won’t be anywhere near O’s 2012 numbers in PA and Trump will blow the 2.7M of 08 & 12 out of the water. Hillary will be lucky if she sees 2.5/6M in PA. Trump will be close to 3M. Philly machine will not be able to put enough in the box to carry the state.

A month from now we’ll see.. The traditional pundit believes this is a slog and up hill election that will be close... I see it as a disruptive cycle that isn’t going to be close at all.

A few more weeks we’ll see whose right. Given the traditional arguments have fallen to reality this entire cycle... Trump should have never been the nominee based on traditional approach... Yet here we are and folks still keep trying to argue the traditional viewpoint.

Time will tell. I see it Hillary has a functional max or low 40s, no matter what she does she won’t top that. Trump should easily manage far above that as long as he doesn’t self destruct.

[kabar]

Obama has huge enthusiasm, that Hillary does not have... 65 M votes on Election Day for her is wishful thinking. She has nowhere near the support, enthusiasm or anything else to be close to Obama’s 12 numbers.

Obama didn't have huge enthusiasm in 2012 compared to 2008. He received 3.5 million less and his winning margin was cut from 7.6% to 3.8%, almost half. He still won by 5 million votes. Romney and McCain both received less votes than Bush did in 2004 (62 million). Romney received a million more votes than McCain.

The population of voters is increasing every year. In 2000 we had a national population of 281 million compared to 320 million today. In 16 years we added the equivalent of another CA. We have added 35 million legal permanent immigrants who eventually are eligible to vote.

Each year we bring in 1.1 million legal permanent immigrants, 87% of whom are minorities as classified by the USG. Minorities and immigrants vote more than two to one Dem. By 2019, half of the children 18 and under will be minorities. As a result, each cohort that turns 18 annually will be more minority and Dem than the previous one.

By 2043 non-Hispanic whites will be 50% of the population down from 63% today and down from 89% in 1970. Non-Hispanic whites are the Reps main power base. Forget the illegal aliens. Legal immigration is making the Dems the permanent majority party.

Hillary won’t be anywhere near O’s 2012 numbers in PA and Trump will blow the 2.7M of 08 & 12 out of the water. Hillary will be lucky if she sees 2.5/6M in PA. Trump will be close to 3M. Philly machine will not be able to put enough in the box to carry the state.

PA has gone Dem the past 6 elections. 1988 was the last time the Reps won (by 105,000 votes). The Philly and Pittsburgh machines manufacture the votes needed to win. Something is going on there that is not kosher. In 2004 Bush won 2.7 million votes, more than 500,000 than the previous election and still lost to Kerry who received 2.9 million, almost 500,000 more than Gore received in 2000. In 2012 Obama received almost 500,000 votes more than Romney in Philadelphia and 90,000 more than Romney in Allegheny County (Pittsburgh). So Obama lost the rest of the state by 300,000 and still won by 300,000 with the margin being Philly and Pittsburgh. No doubt voter fraud was rampant.

A month from now we’ll see.. The traditional pundit believes this is a slog and up hill election that will be close... I see it as a disruptive cycle that isn’t going to be close at all.

It will be close if Trump wins. If Hillary wins, it will be a blowout, at least electorally.

[ronnie raygun]

This fits hillarys family community picture, children from different mothers different fathers, lesbians and mom, gays and dads, prostitutes, underage girls

[SaveFerris]

Interesting

[SaveFerris]

Quite the governor, he was. And he had friends back then.