Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: All

I have read that one side disaster of giving away control is that the new controlling body will have control over the .mil domain. The one where our Military communicates with it’s members about non-classified information. Can anyone comment on this?


24 posted on 09/24/2016 7:24:55 AM PDT by originalbuckeye ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: originalbuckeye

It’s true, ICANN lobbyists have lied time again.

It’s not clear what ICANN intends to do with .mil and .gov websites — keeping all of their options open for some reason.

If you check the key word: icann, you will find answers to all of those questions:
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/icann/index?tab=articles

But I’ll go over the .mil and .gov sites with you specifically.


28 posted on 09/25/2016 5:01:26 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (Trump Opposed to ICANN reform --China's conquest of internet, Hillary's gatekeeper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: originalbuckeye

This is the quick way to explain why ICANN is so dangerous.

They essentially ‘govern’ the TLDs [top level domains].

Each TLD [such as .com or .org] runs its own ‘phone directory’.

And ICANN controls them through ‘Registry Operator Code of Conduct’.

Right now ICANN is subject to US law, mainly because its headquarters are in the US. And that is why their codes of conduct are so light — restricted by US law.

But if ICANN’s contract isn’t renewed, it’s free to move overseas [which it secretly plans to] and modify its ‘Registry Operator Code of Conduct’ for each dot-com or dot-org or ...

... theoretically even our military websites.

From October on through to a republican president, there’s no telling how much the White House will coordinate with ICANN in the name of ‘no controlling legal authority’.


30 posted on 09/25/2016 5:18:17 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (Trump Opposed to ICANN reform --China's conquest of internet, Hillary's gatekeeper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson