Posted on 09/22/2016 8:36:40 AM PDT by DUMBGRUNT
'He was allowed to drive away alive':
A white man brandishing a gun was filmed driving slowly through a crowd of demonstrators as violence erupted in Charlotte on Wednesday night. A video of the alarming moment was posted on social media by writer Heather Head in the midst of the chaos. 'White dude drives into crowd of peaceful protesters, draws gun, allowed to drive away alive. With my own eyes. #CharlotteProtest,' she wrote alongside the shocking clip. The man was surrounded by protesters who were marching against the deadly shooting of black man Keith Lamont Scott by a cop on Tuesday afternoon. Scroll down for video
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
” It is illegal to openly carry a gun at a protest or civil disorder in the state”
The Daily Mail got caught by a simplified interpretation of the law at an Internet site.
It is only illegal to carry a weapon at a protest or civil disorder
“in furtherance of, a civil disorder.”
http://gunwatch.blogspot.com/2016/09/armed-man-is-able-to-drive-through.html
Not after they saw the gun.
They prefer to inflict mayhem on unarmed women or short thin elderly men.
And how exactly do you know this ?
For what it is worth, #16 was my favorite, and I didn’t get #59 at all...
Heheheh...
Thanks for that clarification.
Funny how that works, ehh ?
Pretty big supposition there, n00b.
You apparently don't know the same (if any) 2A supporters that I do.
Good catch .. quite possible.
I like your tag line.
He may have had another gun on the console, to blast the bitch who took the gun outside the car.
I Love #14. It is very funny. The tile layer was very good.
What is wrong with #47, the gas pump price?
#59. It looks like the chicks have black/white nail polish that matches their shoes (opposite of their dresses).
I liked the 9 items listed as the 10 Signs of Impeding [sic] Peril.
I had #10 as “Driving down Martin Luther King Boulevard”, which is demonstrably a place you don’t want to be at any time in any large urban area in this country, but that truth was too uncomfortable for some people, so I removed it.
That explains it, then. I wondered from the spacing if there had originally been a tenth item.
Thank you.
I found it disappointing to learn that Orwell was a socialist, but I am convinced that he somehow was never able to make the intellectual leap that socialism IS tyranny which ALWAYS evolves from a good-intentioned do-good, elitist, nanny-state mentality to full blow tyranny with all the fixings such as the Ministry of Truth and the Ministry of Love.
Perhaps because he wrote “1984” in 1949, and was never really privy to the modern criticisms and denouncements of socialism that we have today.
But boy, was he ever spot on when he wrote “1984”. However, he should have put a codicil of some kind in the foreword that “1984” was meant to be a warning, not an instructional manual, which liberals clearly seem to view it as.
I admit that I do find it really funny that people have poked holes in it...which they have done good-naturedly, because I believe it triggers a kind of OCD in other like-minded people as it does in me when I view a flawed flowchart (which I do a lot)
To me, seeing a flaw in a flowchart is like seeing a manhole cover painted with lane dividers, removed by some municipal government worker drone, and put back in place with the lines out of alignment!
The manhole covers don’t bother me too much (though if I were the one replacing them, the stripes would be lined up), but I do tend to trace through flowcharts when I see them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.