To: gaijin
Can we get a reputable source please? No disrespect, but WND is not necessarily credible.
26 posted on
09/13/2016 5:39:50 PM PDT by
Reno89519
(It is very simple, Trump/Pence or Clinton/Kaine. Good riddance Lyn' Ted, we regret ever knowing you)
To: Reno89519
Can we get a reputable source please? No disrespect, but WND is not necessarily credible.
My experience as well, thanks.
31 posted on
09/13/2016 5:42:54 PM PDT by
freebird5850
(Trust Republicans Under My Presindency)
To: Reno89519
Can we get a reputable source please? What would you prefer? The New York Times?
I swear...
52 posted on
09/13/2016 5:54:33 PM PDT by
Windflier
(Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
To: Reno89519
WND is credible; it’s just that liberals consider it a sham site.
108 posted on
09/13/2016 7:16:43 PM PDT by
Theodore R.
(Trump-Pence, 2016)
To: Reno89519
No disrespect, but WND is not necessarily credible.
_______________________________
You mean like the NY Times, the WP, the Atlanta Constitution, the KC Star, the Miami Herald, etc., etc.? Jeez!
To: Reno89519
The MSM has been so overtly invested in the Clinton Campaign since she was selected that they are no longer trusted as reputable by a huge percentage of the population.......
WND actually deals in truth, ...not the typical liberal spin & propaganda intended to facilitate social engineering.
121 posted on
09/14/2016 6:00:42 PM PDT by
Trump_vs_Evil_Witch
(Huma Abedin + Hillary Clinton => Muslim Brotherhood asset, lesbian spy ring)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson