My opinion is irrelevant, and you are trying to create a diversion.
If you disagree with something in the video, it is incumbent on you to show why the woman is in error.
No, it isn't.
I'm not the one making the extraordinary claim. As one representing her view, it is incumbent on YOU to do so.
Wrong. If the video made a claim, it is up to the video to substantiate that claim.
And quoting studies in the humanities is clearly insufficient, as a recently published survey has noted that approximately 2/3 of published results in the humanities, simply cannot be replicated.
Nice try though, troll-boy.
That is called a reversal of proof logical fallacy. You are basing it on an "appeal to authority" fallacy, to boot.
The very premise of your proffering this video is sorely need of rejection.