Because pre-Labor Day it wasn’t clear.
Are you really serious? If he said last week he'd announce after Labor Day who he was voting for, then he'd already decided who he was voting for and just wanted to build up a large enough audience to spike his ratings. What? You think he was sitting around Hamlet-like all last week trying to decide? Ridiculous.
So you DISHONESTLY took his POST Labor Day announcement and applied it retroactively.
News for you: had it been clear, obvious, or even surmisable PRE-LABOR Day, Levin would not have (1) had to prep his audience for the big announcement, or (2) have had to make the announcement at all.
Once again, what are you talking about Mr. Fantasy Writer? Obviously, before Levin made his announcement nobody was absolutely sure what he would say. But if one wanted to make a bet, the signs were all there that he'd endorse Trump. I saw that. You didn't.
The signs were there, because whatever Levin said about Trump, what he said about Hillary Clinton was even more negative. You focused on the bogus headlines from months back that took Levin's emotional rant as a definitive statement that he'd never vote for Trump.
How silly was that? Of course, when Levin makes an endorsement, it's going to be a major thing for him, not something he tosses off in the middle of a rant months before.
"Prepping" the audience, making an official announcement: all ways of boosting ratings. But anybody who really thought he was going to back Clinton or Johnson or staying home wasn't paying very close attention.
You were saying Mark Levin wouldn't endorse Donald Trump. I said he probably would. And look what happened. He did. All the snark and accusations don't change that.
‘You were saying Mark Levin wouldn’t endorse Donald Trump.’
I was reading carefully through your comments, wordy though they were. I could with ease respond to your completely-missing-the-point points...but then I came to the above outright lie.
I don’t like lies.
If you care to rephrase your comments so as to eliminate this blatant lie, I’ll be happy to respond.
Otherwise, here is my response:
If you have to lie to make your case, your case is ipso facto a lost cause.