Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A few notes on polls
8/1/2016 | LS

Posted on 08/01/2016 8:27:01 PM PDT by LS

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: LS

Massive undersampling of Republicans.

No wonder Hillary is up by double digits!

No one believes that including CNN but it still helps them sell an agenda.

Whether the poll is true or not doesn’t matter.


21 posted on 08/01/2016 9:02:25 PM PDT by goldstategop ((In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: LS

This is good reading I need to sit down with it later. Love what I read so far.


22 posted on 08/01/2016 9:02:57 PM PDT by toddausauras (Trump 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS; Jane Long; NIKK; exit82; MinuteGal; onyx

Lots of good materials
Well done LS


23 posted on 08/01/2016 9:04:14 PM PDT by hoosiermama (Trump card is exposing the Fifth Column in the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS

Insert “the only poll that matters” trope here.

But you know, it’s true.

DAMN THE TORPEDOES!


24 posted on 08/01/2016 9:04:26 PM PDT by Huck (BE STRONG. DO NOT SHOW THE ENEMY YOUR FEAR. FIGHT AND WIN. TRUMP 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

it will come down to the debates..if Trump kicks Hillary’s ass he becomes president..if it’s vise versa she wins..that simple..tonight on Hannity Trump sounded very presidential..intelligent..good message..he continues talking like that he can win


25 posted on 08/01/2016 9:08:04 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: LS
It is a deliberate abuse of methodology to ask any eligibility question of a respondent other than whether they are, or are not, of the targeted group (adult/likely/registered.) If they are not of the targeted group for the poll, their answering of the phone -- even if they refer you to someone in the household who is a member of the targeted group -- has to be corrected by an appropriate factor for refusals.

When a poll is cited as having a ±3% MOE, it means nothing more than that you can say with 95% confidence that the mean answer for the sample population falls within ±%3 of the entire population of that cohort -- IF the sampling mehtodology is truly random. That is all it means.

It has no mathematically rigorous predictive ability, despite its being labelled "scientific" because it is nothing more than an indication of how that cohort would vote if they were voting today. It is of little practical predictive ability because the cohorts: adults ≠ registered voters ≠ likely voters ≠ people who will vote on election day ≠ people who will vote on election day and honestly answer the question of how they voted.

This is why Gallup has dropped out of the presidential polling business: in order to be useful, your model must be able to turn your target population into the actual voting population, and there is no mathematically, statistically, or even psychologically sound methodology for doing that. "Likely" generally "seems" better, but even that varies with the quality of a pollster's special sauce. The degree to which "likely" is properly modelled to extrapolate to voters-on-the-first-Tuesday-of-November is entirely a crap shoot which no polling organization has mastered for more than two elections in a row.

26 posted on 08/01/2016 9:11:26 PM PDT by FredZarguna (And what Rough Beast, its hour come round at last, slouches toward Fifth Avenue to be born?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS

Nice clear assessment. It would be interesting to track non-respondents for all these polls.
One other thought, this is an election where both candidates have significant negatives. Which polls or polling methods work best under such conditions.


27 posted on 08/01/2016 9:12:33 PM PDT by bjc (Show me the data!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS

Do the math. Just the women and minority vote puts Hillary close to 45%. Hopefully that’s her ceiling.


28 posted on 08/01/2016 9:15:54 PM PDT by 38special (For real, y'all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS; gubamyster
The USC poll is problematic because it involves a fixed sample of respondents who are randomly sampled initially, but who understand they're part of a sampling group. This means they know they're going to be resampled and their answers are no longer the same as a person receiving a cold call at random. They typically pay closer attention to the news than a randomly sampled population as a result.

Remember also that increasing the size of the sample only decreases the MOE as the square root of the number sampled. Sampling 5000 adults only reduces the MOE from ±3 to ±1.34, but increases the cost by a factor of 5.

And, remember the biggest error is not in the MOE, which is well known, but in determining how to decide which of your respondents are going to actually vote.

29 posted on 08/01/2016 9:21:21 PM PDT by FredZarguna (And what Rough Beast, its hour come round at last, slouches toward Fifth Avenue to be born?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

“I think Trump will win if he backs off this Kahn guy...”

Kahn will be a distant, nearly forgotten memory, long before November 8th.

He won’t even be be a small factor in the vote, by that time.


30 posted on 08/01/2016 9:22:45 PM PDT by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

Yeah probably some computer games they play to make it seem legit.


31 posted on 08/01/2016 9:22:52 PM PDT by hsmomx3 (TRUMP 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

I thought the same thing. Sean asked him a question (I can’t remember what it was) and he changed the subject and got on message. He needs to do that more often.


32 posted on 08/01/2016 9:29:35 PM PDT by ZagFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: LS

Agree with your post, and would add that there’s WAY too much that can happen between now and November to put any faith in polls at all. Wikileaked emails, terrorist attacks, social media kerfuffles, etc. At best, they are a sign of trends.


33 posted on 08/01/2016 9:30:28 PM PDT by Scutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZagFan

he was very presidential..but he needs to do that more often..not just when he talks to a neutral party..he is very capable of being presidential..and the Trump I saw tonight can beat Clinton in a debate


34 posted on 08/01/2016 9:34:38 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Scutter

I remember when McCain was up 7 points..looking like he would win the election..the second the stock market tanked that was it..game over..no one knows what will happen between now and November anything can happen and change everything


35 posted on 08/01/2016 9:36:34 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: LS
Immortal post by Freeper LS after the 2008 election disaster:

Official Pile On/Eating Macaca Thread

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2125687/posts

Nov 5, 2008

"Two weeks ago, if I had told you that deep red precincts would turn out at record levels, you would have thought that John McCain would not only win, but that he might win by a comfortable margin.

Well, didn't happen.

The "turnout model" of politics is officially dead---the one that says if you get "your people" to the polls, you win. The trouble is, they have to really be "your people."

I went downtown to count votes at 7:00. Our whole team thought not only had we won Dayton, but OH, and probably---with turnout rates like that---indicated McCain would do very well. I can't tell you how excited they were based on the turnout. In Miamisburg, two very Republican precincts had voted out 75% by 5:00 in the evening.

We got a report from a Trotwood Republican precinct that had voted at an 80% clip. Darke County called in saying they were at near-record 80%.

Finally---and I know I don't have credibility here (Freeper Captain Kirk was dead on)---the national numbers suggest that there was a "reverse Bradley," a guilt vote. This could account for some of the R defections.

I'm eating macaca. So pile on.

But you can trust me on this: we all have a lot more to worry about now than who was the best political prognosticator. God save our once-great nation."

36 posted on 08/01/2016 9:40:46 PM PDT by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS

I also think that there is a real possibility that there are a lot of Trump supporters that are unwilling to tell a pollster hiw they really feel. There has been so much negative press and so much shaming test people don’t want to answer.


37 posted on 08/01/2016 9:56:57 PM PDT by gunnut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gunnut
I also think that there is a real possibility that there are a lot of Trump supporters that are unwilling to tell a pollster hiw they really feel.

And people have the impression that the NSA is monitoring all phone calls.....resulting in something like this....

Obamacare Navigator: ..."your voting record does nor conform to standards"

..."and your answers to polling questions prior to the last election are way out of line..."

38 posted on 08/01/2016 10:16:19 PM PDT by spokeshave (Somewhere there is a ceiling for Trump.....Yeah, it's called The Oval Office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: 38special
Just the women and minority vote puts Hillary close to 45%. Hopefully that’s her ceiling.

I hope to God that Trump is aggressively courting the black vote. Trump has to be able to convince them that all those years of voting Democrat has brought them nothing but misery.

If there ever was a time for a GOP candidate to get a larger than normal share of the black vote, this would be the time. If Trump can get 15% to 20% of the black vote, this election is over as Trump would win big.

Go get those votes Trump!

39 posted on 08/01/2016 10:28:47 PM PDT by eekitsagreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

Kahn is rapidly becoming a liability to Killary as the hits on him keep on coming. He is getting torn apart.


40 posted on 08/01/2016 10:39:51 PM PDT by DarthVader (Politicians govern out of self interest, Statesmen govern for a Vision greater than themselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson