Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rocky exercise device will help keep deep space a fit place
phys.org ^ | July 19, 2016 by | Matt Williams, Universe Today

Posted on 07/19/2016 12:31:23 PM PDT by BenLurkin

While astronauts on the ISS have enough space for the work-out equipment they need to help reduce these effects (i.e. muscle degeneration and loss of bone density), long-range missions are another matter. Luckily, NASA has plans for how astronauts can stay healthy during their upcoming Journey to Mars. It's known as the Resistive Overload Combined with Kinetic Yo-Yo (ROCKY) device, which will be used aboard the Orion spacecraft.

For years, engineers at NASA and in the private sector have been working to create the components that will take astronauts to the Red Planet in the 2030s. These include the Space Launch System (SLS) and the Orion Multi Purpose Crew Capsule. At the same time, scientists and engineers at the Ohio-based Zin Technologies company – with the support of the NASA Human Research Program's Exploration Exercise Equipment project – were busy developing the equipment needed to keep the Martian crews healthy and fit in space.

One of the biggest challenges was making a device that is robust enough to provide a solid work-out, but still be compact and light-weight enough to fit inside the space capsule. What they came up with was ROCKY, a rowing machine-like tool that can accommodate both aerobic activity and strength training. Using loads that simulate up to 180 kg (400 pounds) of resistance, astronauts will be ale to perform excises like squats, deadlifts and heel raises, as well as upper body exercises like bicep curls and upright rows.

(Excerpt) Read more at phys.org ...


TOPICS: Travel
KEYWORDS: mars; orion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 07/19/2016 12:31:23 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

when re they going to make a “wheel” shaped spacecraft so they can artifically create at least SOME gravity


2 posted on 07/19/2016 12:33:46 PM PDT by Mr. K (Trump will win NY state - choke on that HilLIARy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
when are they going to make a “wheel” shaped spacecraft so they can artificially create at least SOME gravity

Likely right after someone invents a frictionless material for the huge bearings that will be needed at the hub of such a "wheel".

3 posted on 07/19/2016 12:39:57 PM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (Blue on Black, match on a fire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

If you ask me, there should going into deep space without one. Traveling that far away, they should be bringing their own full size space station along to live in.

But there are better and brighter people than myself in charge of these things.


4 posted on 07/19/2016 12:42:11 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts

There’s always magnetic bearings if that is your concern. I think it more likely engineering issues of being able to maneuver something which is a giant gyroscope and doesn’t want to turn.


5 posted on 07/19/2016 12:43:28 PM PDT by drbuzzard (All animals are created equal, but some are more equal than others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts

why make the hub stationary?
let the whole thing rotate


6 posted on 07/19/2016 12:43:39 PM PDT by Mr. K (Trump will win NY state - choke on that HilLIARy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: drbuzzard

Would counter rotating wheels work?
I think that’s how some designs of helicopters fly without a tail rotor?


7 posted on 07/19/2016 12:44:59 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
when re they going to make a “wheel” shaped spacecraft so they can artifically create at least SOME gravity.

I have often wondered the same thing. In fact, Hollyweird has depicted this in several movies. Considering all that has to be done is to build a Tube and spin it rapidly, it seems simple. The craft would need to be assembled in space and that might be challenging.

I expect the problems are: for some components like navigation, experiments and communications, there needs to be a stable platform (not rotating).There may be a need to have a component of the craft that is not rotating. Anything attached will create friction and thereby rob energy and create wear on components. It's a failure point that is difficult to test. Also, maintaining the balance in a gyroscopic vessel would be critical for the craft to maintain a constant trajectory without regular correction (more energy consumption).

8 posted on 07/19/2016 12:45:14 PM PDT by Tenacious 1 (You couldn't pay me enough to be famous for being stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Resistive Overload Combined with Kinetic what?!?
9 posted on 07/19/2016 12:45:16 PM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts
when are they going to make a “wheel” shaped spacecraft so they can artificially create at least SOME gravity

Likely right after someone invents a frictionless material for the huge bearings that will be needed at the hub of such a "wheel".

Are you assuming the need for non rotatating center core? What need is there for that? Given a slow rim speed, a fixed central core would barely register as moving, no?

10 posted on 07/19/2016 12:47:38 PM PDT by Covenantor (Men are ruled...by liars who refuse them news, and by fools who cannot govern. " Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

How about some bungee cords and a couple of eyebolts welded to the interior of the craft? It may not be Gold’s Gym, but the resistance should keep you from turning into a gersh on the trip. You can work arms, legs, back, even abs to some degree. Add more (or stiffer) cords to increase the resistance.

You can even call them Space Bungees and charge NASA $100,000 apiece for them.


11 posted on 07/19/2016 1:09:16 PM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IronJack

Has to have a cutesy name before NASA will buy it.

Some cutesy anagram, like the Deepspace Unified Preventive Exercise Module or “DUPEM”


12 posted on 07/19/2016 1:15:06 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: drbuzzard

Question: Does the gyroscopic effect work in space?


13 posted on 07/19/2016 1:20:30 PM PDT by catbertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

It has to be a fairly large diameter to be practical.


14 posted on 07/19/2016 1:23:46 PM PDT by samtheman (Delegate Freedom Means Voter Disfranchisement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
This is the device they're putting on the IST, the "MED-2". Its launch weight is 65 lbs. or about one half that of a female astronaut. And God only knows what it costs. The ROCKY device looks like it works on the same principle but its housed in a black cube. For the life of me I don't see where either of them couldn't be replaced by a set of elastic tubes, handles, and a few securing points on a bulkhead. Cost: a few dollars. Launch weight: almost nothing.


15 posted on 07/19/2016 1:40:04 PM PDT by katana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Bungee-Oriented Group Uniform Stressor (BOGUS).


16 posted on 07/19/2016 1:53:00 PM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Copy this design.

Blnk
17 posted on 07/19/2016 1:58:56 PM PDT by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

What about a Bowflex?


18 posted on 07/19/2016 2:02:09 PM PDT by Mr. Blond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: catbertz

Yes. It is an effect of momentum, not gravity.


19 posted on 07/19/2016 2:07:45 PM PDT by Flying Circus (God save us!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
That's all well and good, the limb muscles will be maintained. But, there's this: Possible Mars Mission 'Showstopper': Vision Risks for Astronauts. Looks like they'll need a flywheel a la 2001: Space Odyssey.
20 posted on 07/19/2016 3:27:42 PM PDT by pa_dweller (Of all the things I've lost I miss my mind the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson