Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Silentgypsy

I think there’s something of a historical consensus that Herod the Great was bats.


7,145 posted on 12/25/2016 9:52:28 AM PST by Tax-chick ("No general but Ludd means the poor any good.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7144 | View Replies ]


To: Tax-chick; Silentgypsy

Herod the Great was at a minimum paranoid. He had his sons killed so they wouldn’t usurp his throne. Since Herod (an Idumean) was attempting to convince the Jews that he was one of them, it was said that it was safer to be Herod’s pig than his son..

He also killed his wife for (it is said) the same reason. His fear of losing his throne puts the Biblical story of his ordering the death of the Bethlehem infants in perspective.

Josephus records that Herod attempted suicide by stabbing but was prevented by his aides. He died in 4 BC, thus placing the birth of Jesus at least four years earlier than the calendar.. ;-)


7,146 posted on 12/25/2016 10:30:17 AM PST by NoCmpromiz (John 14:6 is a non-pluralistic comment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7145 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson