Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Tax-chick

Maybe:

‘If cities defy Federal law, then they lose Federal funds.’

I don’t like the ‘should’. Not imperative enough. Maybe ‘shall’ or ‘will’?

And I want to explicitly target sanctuary cities


5,816 posted on 11/13/2016 8:36:45 AM PST by null and void (No federal funds for "sanctuary" cities that defy federal law!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5815 | View Replies ]


To: null and void

Then how about: “If sanctuary cities defy Federal law, then they will lose Federal funds.”

What I don’t like about this is (a) that “sanctuary cities” and “defy Federal law” is redundant; and (b) that “will lose Federal funds” is a predictive statement about a future that is actually unknown. It is entirely possible that the status of sanctuary cities will continue as-is for a considerable length of time.


5,817 posted on 11/13/2016 8:45:05 AM PST by Tax-chick (Proud to be on the enemies list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5816 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson