Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is there any prosecutor out there with enough stones to convene a grand jury on Clinton's emails?
Complete frustration at the rigged system | July 5, 2016 | ChiefJayStrongbow

Posted on 07/05/2016 6:22:53 PM PDT by ChiefJayStrongbow

Lynch isn't the only one who can convene a grand jury ... There has to be some prosecutor who would be willing to convene a grand jury.

Justice delayed is justice denied. The people need a voice.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: clinton; emails

1 posted on 07/05/2016 6:22:53 PM PDT by ChiefJayStrongbow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ChiefJayStrongbow

No there is not one. Everyone else is too intimidated to touch this case.


2 posted on 07/05/2016 6:25:03 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChiefJayStrongbow

and then there would be the question of what to do with a True Bill


3 posted on 07/05/2016 6:28:05 PM PDT by dontreadthis (I finally came up with this tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChiefJayStrongbow

Maybe we can find one with no family and has only six months left to live.


4 posted on 07/05/2016 6:30:54 PM PDT by Michael.SF. (That was the gift the president gave us, the gift of happiness, of being together,' Cindy Sheehan")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChiefJayStrongbow

You need to have standing. Only a federal prosecutor has the appropriate standing.


5 posted on 07/05/2016 6:31:30 PM PDT by Vermont Lt (Ask Bernie supporters two questions: Who is rich. Who decides. In the past, that meant who died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChiefJayStrongbow

It needs to be someone with one foot in the grave, because Team Hill-Da-Beast will probably ‘off’ them anyway.


6 posted on 07/05/2016 6:32:35 PM PDT by CivilWarBrewing (Females DESTROYED America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: ChiefJayStrongbow

according to Comey’s remarks today, Hillary cannot qualify for a security clearance.

I’m waiting for the Dem spin on why a security clearance is not necessary for an ‘irresponsible, grossly careless and negligent’ president to have codes to the nuclear football.


8 posted on 07/05/2016 6:36:33 PM PDT by blueplum (March 11, 2016 - the day the First Amendment died?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChiefJayStrongbow

I wouldn’t hold my breath


9 posted on 07/05/2016 6:43:57 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChiefJayStrongbow

Not any prosecutor can bring charges. The law Clinton violated is a federal law so it has to be a US attorney. Furthermore, it has to be in a district which has jurisdiction. In this case, I think I read that the US Attorney for the District of Northern Virginia is the one who would have had jurisdiction to bring charges.

All of the 93 US Attorneys are political appointees who serve at the pleasure of Obama. Their staffs include career attorneys who are ostensibly ‘non-partisan’ (cough, cough), but the guy who would make a decision is going to do what Obama/Lynch tell them or they won’t be a US Attorney for very long.


10 posted on 07/05/2016 6:44:36 PM PDT by CaptainMorgantown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Gutless cowards all. Afraid of an evil woman


11 posted on 07/05/2016 6:49:09 PM PDT by ZULU (Donald Trump is the biggest threat to the New World Order since Barry Goldwater)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ChiefJayStrongbow

I assume that was a rhetorical question. ...


12 posted on 07/05/2016 6:56:08 PM PDT by gibsosa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChiefJayStrongbow

I won’t be surprised to see ‘Judicial Watch’ make an attempt.


13 posted on 07/05/2016 6:57:54 PM PDT by Pilgrim's Progress (http://www.baptistbiblebelievers.com/BYTOPICS/tabid/335/Default.aspx D)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChiefJayStrongbow

I won’t be surprised to see ‘Judicial Watch’ make an attempt.


14 posted on 07/05/2016 6:58:14 PM PDT by Pilgrim's Progress (http://www.baptistbiblebelievers.com/BYTOPICS/tabid/335/Default.aspx D)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pilgrim's Progress

JW is the only recourse, and they probably will give it a shot, given they are our ‘alternate Congress’ and the only entity that ACTUALLY ACCOMPLISHES ANYTHING.


15 posted on 07/05/2016 7:21:20 PM PDT by CivilWarBrewing (Females DESTROYED America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ChiefJayStrongbow

President Trump’s US AG will...


16 posted on 07/05/2016 7:29:32 PM PDT by Hotlanta Mike ('You can avoid reality, but you can't avoid the consequences of avoiding reality.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarBrewing

You are 100% correct about JW. They are the only one’s that seem to have balls enough to try to get something done about the corruption in Washington. The deserve everyone’s support.


17 posted on 07/05/2016 8:15:36 PM PDT by N9841A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ChiefJayStrongbow

Not in DC. Most federal District Attorneys are bought and paid for by Obama and/or the Clintons, or both. State Attorneys Generals wouldn’t have standing and some are totally corrupt including the 12 who are suing Exxon re their research data on environmental issues, Mark Herring, the VA AG who won’t enforce the law against Democrat crooks, the NY AG who is corrupt as the rest of that state’s leadership, etc.

If Diogenes came to the US looking for an honest man, he’d die of disappointment in minutes.

The honest people are not in power or have been rendered impotent by the extremely corrupt but powerful Clinton/Obama criminal machine. Comey is proof of that. Lynch was bought off long ago, as was Holder.
Obama is a traitor. Always has been. Always will be.

“Honesty” - the next word the PC Marxists will ban.


18 posted on 07/05/2016 8:19:34 PM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChiefJayStrongbow

“Reasonable” in this case means, do you want to see your kids grow up and meet your grandchildren?


19 posted on 07/05/2016 9:35:09 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Let's Make Our Founding Documents Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChiefJayStrongbow

Giuliani said he could convict her....


20 posted on 07/06/2016 3:05:37 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson