EXCLUSIVE–Darrell Issa: There Is Enough Evidence to Indict Hillary Clinton

http://www.breitbart.com/ ^ | 6/25/16 | Patrick Howley

[V K Lee]

Republican California Rep. Darrell Issa said that there is enough evidence to indict Hillary Clinton for mishandling national security information on her private email server.

“There is more than enough for an indictment,” Issa, the former House Oversight Committee chairman, told Breitbart News Saturday on Sirius/XM Patriot Channel 125. Issa explained:

[V K Lee]

Oh dear!

[cableguymn]

So do it.

[Paladin2]

Just go straight to convict and incarcerate.

[wally_bert]

[Theodore R.]

We’ve heard it before, but the American people like Mrs. Bill.

[Paladin2]

Oh, it’s only Issa, the old, well funded, Head Hunter with an empty Trophy Room.

[rdl6989]

So get on with it already!

[lee martell]

Hearing Darryl Issa or Gowdy make big pronouncements has little effect on my optimism these days. I’ve been hearing about ‘evidence’ against Hillary for well over a year.

[OldSmaj]

“There is more than enough for an indictment,” Issa...told Breitbart News...

What the hell is this...Ground Hog Day?

Same old, same old, day after day after day.

I've lost faith in Issa and Gowdy.

[Ray76]

No kidding?

[MUDDOG]

But no one to put the bell on the cat.

[Aliska]

No surprise to those of us following the email scandal. Also sure seems like other serious charges could be brought re CGI. Not gonna happen though. Judge Jeanine has it nailed.

[Empireoftheatom48]

I’m sorry, blah,blah, blah, blah, blah.

[Little Ray]

What has that got to do with anything?
Issa had his chance and did not do a darn thing.
And the DoJ will either refuse to prosecute or throw the case.

[SERKIT]

[vpintheak]

Waiting.....

[AndyJackson]

“There is more than enough for an indictment,”

Little Issa should just shut up. I want Hillary taken down, but his spouting off his meaningless. There is enough evidence to indict my dog for tax evasion. In return for services rendered he receives in kind payments of food and treats. There is no record of income, he has never filed, and never made an estimated tax payment.

The accurate statement is that we have enough evidence to put her away on xxx yyy charges. But not Issa and his worthless committee. Maybe he could start holding hearings on the dog tax evasion problem. He is up to it and it is a scandal in the making.

[dynachrome]

Issa and Gowdy have ended up like Glenn Beck with their “big” announcements.

[Artcore]

Okay A$$ Clown...then do your duty!

Good grief, the GOPe are utterly useless idiots!

[philman_36]

Issa said that while there is enough evidence to indict, the American people will have to play judge and jury in November’s election.
That is a despicable cop out!

BREAKING: Rep. Steve Stockman: Sgt. At Arms to Arrest Lois Lerner

The New York Times also recognizes the House’s power to arrest.
“From the Republic’s earliest days, Congress has had the right to hold recalcitrant witnesses in contempt — and even imprison them — all by itself. In 1795, shortly after the Constitution was ratified, the House ordered its sergeant at arms to arrest and detain two men accused of trying to bribe members of Congress. The House held a trial and convicted one of them,” the Times wrote in a Dec. 4, 2007 editorial.
“In 1821, the Supreme Court upheld Congress’s right to hold people in contempt and imprison them. Without this power, the court ruled, Congress would “be exposed to every indignity and interruption, that rudeness, caprice, or even conspiracy, may mediate against it.” Later, in a 1927 case arising from the Teapot Dome scandal, the court upheld the Senate’s arrest of the brother of a former attorney general — carried out in Ohio by the deputy sergeant at arms — for ignoring a subpoena to testify,” the Times wrote.

They didn't, but they could have.

No plans to arrest Lois Lerner, John Boehner says

Boehner said a provision allowing the House to make its own arrest has "never been used and I'm not sure it's an appropriate way to go about this. It's up to Eric holder to do his job."

Another cop out!

Contempt Power

Under the inherent contempt power of the House, the recalcitrant witness may be arrested and brought to trial before the bar of the House, with the offender facing possible incarceration. 3 Hinds § 1685.