Posted on 06/23/2016 11:14:29 AM PDT by massmike
Father's Day propaganda. Boston Globe photo of "transgender dad" at work.
The incoherent war on truth continues.
On Father’s Day the Boston Globe, the major newspaper in New England, featured a lavish front-page article about a father who had “transitioned to a female”. There was an accompanying article by his son – a Boston Globe videographer – who describes that he is now accepting his father’s new “gender” after years of horrible anguish that even caused the son to change his last name.
The articles are laden with sentiments of “tolerance” and “acceptance.” But they can’t avoid mentioning the years of emotional pain that this “transition” caused the man’s wife and three sons. Like so many LGBT stories, this exposes the father’s actions as ultimately self-centered and narcissistic.
The linguistic gymnastics in the article are quite frightening. As the son relates:
-"I got a call, and it was my dad. She was full-on screaming in a man’s voice. My dad initially took on an extreme falsetto voice, but when she gets excited, or laughs, she goes back to a guy’s voice."-
Is this the new frontier of the LGBT movement’s deconstruction of the natural family? Will kids in school soon be taught that their father (and mother) can either be male or female?
By the time the thought police are through, your kids will probably be used to it.
We’ve all seen the flood of “transgender” themes in recent television shows and movies. And of course there’s been the Bruce Jenner media circus. But that only barely touched upon the “fatherhood” aspect.
Parents of schoolchildren are barely catching their breath over the concepts of schoolchildren using “genderless” locker rooms and bathrooms, playing on opposite-sex sports teams, wearing opposite-sex clothes, and having their names changed by the school to comply with their “gender identity” (even without their parents’ knowledge). Unfortunately, it doesn’t end there.
Unfortunately, most pro-family groups across the country, both national and statewide, have taken an approach to “fight” this in a way that we consider almost completely ineffective.
They don’t tell the uncomfortable truth: That “transgender” people are delusional and have serious mental health issues that should be addressed, and that the behavior constitutes a perversion. Instead, they talk about “bathroom predators” and “privacy rights”, which are only peripheral issues at best. And they accept the premise that there should be "acceptance" and "accommodations" for "transgender" students or adults.
Why? It’s because they don’t want to appear intolerant or bigoted. And they’re fearful of incurring incur the wrath of the LGBT movement by directly opposing their ideology. As a result, as we’ve all witnessed, most pro-family groups actually concede that “transgenderism” is a legitimate concept, but then say that “we want our religious freedom rights, too.” (However, they only talk in general terms. They’re afraid to say exactly what the specific religious issue is.) It makes their argument seem weak or even empty.
We saw this pattern before in the 1990s. Parents had barely caught their breath over the“gay and lesbian” concept being pushed in the high schools (along with newly “out” homosexual teachers, “AIDS education” and condom handouts), when the LGBT movement without warning pushed the idea of “diverse families” with “two mommies” or “two daddies” (especially in the early grades). Of course, it followed the political push for homosexual “civil unions” which featured article after article in the mainstream media about homosexual parenting.
The “gay couple” parent concept quickly was brought into the high schools, through intensive day-long “gay and lesbian awareness” programs. Then elementary school teachers began using so-called “teachable moments” and LGBT story books to introduce it to kids as young as kindergarten age.
How did the mainstream pro-family groups react to this? They never described homosexual behavior as something detestable, but rather “something we disagree with on religious grounds” and because “every child needs a mother and a father.” These groups opposed legalizing civil unions but caved on the more informal homosexual “domestic partnerships.” Later, they opposed “gay marriage” but supported civil unions and adoption by homosexuals. It’s proven to be the road to hell.
Now, they are capitulating on the "gender identity" issue, accepting this fraudulent concept and acquiescing on the word "gender" (instead of the accurate word "sex").
Father putting on women's makeup. [Boston Globe photo.]
This is sick mentally ill madness treatable with shock treatments.
Asteroid inbound set to hit San Francisco by 2017... Sorry I was daydreaming....
They made the mistake of assuming acquiescing part of the public sphere would be OK as long as they had a carve out with freedom, while failing to realize the liberal secularists will NOT allow any institution or group to do anything to disagree except in hidden dark corners.
So they let you give them some space, then creep and stretch to take over until it is all of it.
I’ve got to admit,by comparison,the lesbian Miss Missouri doesn’t look so bad now.......
Men will always be men, women will always be women and liberals will always be evil.
So Caitlyn’s wife could become a he and they could still produce kids? Did I say confused kids?
Gawd , this is so sick and now is embedded with child abuse . Think of what these children see? Jesus, save them!!
A commercial came on a couple days ago for a show titled, “I am Jazz”, about a teenage BOY parading around as a girl. In the commercial, HE is in the hospital and appears to about to go under the knife to become a girl. HE says if he doesn’t do it now, he’s going to develop into a BOY. Well, duuuuuh, that’s what happens when you are a B-O-Y. Guess HIS parents will retire early off the royalties from the show. Hope there’s enough $$$ left over for when HE decides one day he wants to go back to being the male he was meant to be.
hslda.org
homeschool your kids.
there are soooo many options available.
More and more these days, saying ‘Liberalism is a mental disorder’ doesn’t seem like enough. Liberals keep on raising the bar with their lunacy.
Liberalism is a mental illness.
I think she’s too old to have children. I mean, he’s too to have a baby. I mean, what?
Take the transmitters away from them. This will not stop until we destroy the left’s control of the information distribution system.
Muslims use a different treatment for this condition. Check Orlando FL.
Shot treatment.
That guy is the ugliest girl I have ever seen!
This was a commercial? For what?
bkmk
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.