Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MtnClimber

It was interesting to see CZ in the running.

Would the US military really choose a design that came out of the Soviet communist arena?


5 posted on 06/08/2016 9:25:12 AM PDT by Brookhaven (Hillary Clinton stood next to the coffin of an American soldier and lied to his parents' face)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Brookhaven

They aren’t smart enough to choose the CZ. It’ll be a modular design with adjustable grips for girls, silencer ready although most soldiers will never see a silencer.
It will be probably the worst pistol ever fielded by a modern military.

A CZ would be fantastic. A Glock would be fantastic. But a CZ is not a communist pistol. No pistol has ever been known to participate in politics.


22 posted on 06/08/2016 9:46:36 AM PDT by DesertRhino ("I want those feeble minded asses overthrown,,,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Brookhaven

CZ P-01 and it’s variants were NATO approved. You may be thinking of their 75s.


39 posted on 06/08/2016 10:00:40 AM PDT by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Brookhaven

When the SAS was looking to replace the Hi-Powers as their standard sidearm in the early 90’s, rumor has it that the rank and file overwhelmingly preferred the CZ-75, but the MOD would not go with a manufacturer that had only recently come out from under the Soviet bloc. I have a 75B (in .40) on my (right) nightstand and it’s my SHTF sidearm of choice for a number of reasons.


71 posted on 06/08/2016 7:30:12 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Qui me amat, amat et canem meum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson