Posted on 06/07/2016 6:16:03 PM PDT by V K Lee
The sometimes controversial scoop journalist that runs GotNews.com has published documents that raise questions about the citizenship status of the parents of federal Judge Gonzalo Curiel, presiding over a suit against Trump University.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...
Perhaps judge is no AMERICAN after all... http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/report-were-judges-mexican-parents-illegals/article/2593250
I guess if the judge is an anchor baby of illegal aliens he would have a different perspective than a citizen of generations of Americans, wouldn’t he?
According to the Constitution, he would not be a citizen.
Somehow the idea that being born in the U.S. of parents who are not citizens makes you a citizen was created by our rulers. It was specifically forbidden by the 14th amendment.
ping
Perhaps judge is no AMERICAN after all...
From the beginning, I had a feeling Trump knew ALLL about this situation — from the beginning. He was just waiting to pounce.
As McConnell says — we all came from somewhere. idiot
PING!
I know someone who is a strident defender of illegal aliens (and a Trump hater) and I wonder about this person's parents also.
Trump, I’m not tired of winning yet.
And I like your style.
Yep.
Mr. Trump is NOT dumb. Not only is he aware of the facts, he has his methods of teaching others how to use the facts. He chose business, but from his educational perspective - he would have been an excellent professor. His students learn....from experience. :)
If true, this could give Trump a hammer to pound on the “anchor baby” controversy and get some changes made.
The 14th Amendment was passed to eliminate citizenship challenges to freed slaves, not to hand out U.S. citizenship to trespassers and tourists.
I believe Congress could pass a “clarifying resolution” and fix the problem overnight?
As asked in a related thread, whatever federal law that Trump University allegedly broke, is the law constitutionally justified under one of Congress’s constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers?
I keep thinking that if Trump University dealt with students through contracts, then consider this. A previous generation of state sovereignty-respecting justices had clarified that Congress’s Commerce Clause power (1.8.3) does not extend to regulating contracts, in this example regardless if such contracts dealt with students not domiciled in NY.
”4. The issuing of a policy of insurance is not a transaction of commerce within the meaning of the latter of the two clauses, even though the parties be domiciled in different States, but is a simple contract [emphases added] of indemnity against loss.” — Paul v. Virginia, 1869. (The corrupt feds have no Commerce Clause (1.8.3) power to regulate contracts.)
Corrections, insights welcome.
I sense that Trump is not pushing the background of Judge Gonzalo Curiel for a reason. I sense a strategy in sitting back and letting things come out to vindicate his case. If anything, the emerging story reminds me of a boil that is gathering in pus and when it explodes, it will make quite a mess.
Holy...
Retweet this and get this to Drudge ASAP.
The 14th Amdnement has been twisted beyond recognition.
"Charles C. Johnson put up documents showing that Curiel's father crossed the U.S. border with Mexico at least twice and might not have become a U.S. citizen.
He also published images of the death certificates of the judge's parents that apparently show no Social Security number.
"GotNews.com can find no evidence that Curiel's parents ever became U.S. citizens. For all we know, Judge Curiel is an anchor baby," he wrote
Crossing the border "at least two times" is not illegal. Indeed, there are thousands of Mexicans who legally cross the border on a weekly or monthly basis to shop, and many of them have crossed the border hundreds of times.
Not becoming a Unites States Citizen is also not illegal. I know people who legally entered the country and became lawful permanent residents.
Just checked my mother's death certificate and there is no social security number on the certificate.
The article is really awful and establishes nothing.
Yuk!
That would make Trump right for who-the-heck-knows-how-many-thousandth time...
bump
Anchor baby judge?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.