I guess if the judge is an anchor baby of illegal aliens he would have a different perspective than a citizen of generations of Americans, wouldn’t he?
According to the Constitution, he would not be a citizen.
Somehow the idea that being born in the U.S. of parents who are not citizens makes you a citizen was created by our rulers. It was specifically forbidden by the 14th amendment.
ping
I know someone who is a strident defender of illegal aliens (and a Trump hater) and I wonder about this person's parents also.
As asked in a related thread, whatever federal law that Trump University allegedly broke, is the law constitutionally justified under one of Congress’s constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers?
I keep thinking that if Trump University dealt with students through contracts, then consider this. A previous generation of state sovereignty-respecting justices had clarified that Congress’s Commerce Clause power (1.8.3) does not extend to regulating contracts, in this example regardless if such contracts dealt with students not domiciled in NY.
”4. The issuing of a policy of insurance is not a transaction of commerce within the meaning of the latter of the two clauses, even though the parties be domiciled in different States, but is a simple contract [emphases added] of indemnity against loss.” — Paul v. Virginia, 1869. (The corrupt feds have no Commerce Clause (1.8.3) power to regulate contracts.)
Corrections, insights welcome.
That would make Trump right for who-the-heck-knows-how-many-thousandth time...