Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: conservative98

Cruz’ quote in the title is correct; Trump was wrong to inject the ethnicity of an American citizen in the debate. I hope he repents; I don’t want this nation to suffer. He was so close in the polls, and is throwing it away.


265 posted on 06/07/2016 7:13:27 AM PDT by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: af_vet_1981

Cruz’ quote in the title is correct; Trump was wrong to inject the ethnicity of an American citizen in the debate. I hope he repents; I don’t want this nation to suffer. He was so close in the polls, and is throwing it away.


Sonia “Wise Latina” Sotomayor ring any bells? Progressives “inject” race all the time. Sorry to say but like Ryan and Cruz you really are a surrender monkey on this issue.


269 posted on 06/07/2016 8:07:19 AM PDT by lodi90 (Clear choice for Conservatives now: TRUMP or lose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies ]

To: af_vet_1981; conservative98; wardaddy; Travis McGee; Mr. Mojo
Cruz’ quote in the title is correct; Trump was wrong to inject the ethnicity of an American citizen in the debate.

Cruz's quote: "Of course it's inappropriate to be attacking a federal judge's race or ethnicity.".

In the interest of fairness and truth, Cruz is a liar.

a) Trump did NOT mention anyone's race. That was an ad lib LIE from Cruz.

b) Cruz purposely gave NO weight or context to the relationship Judge Curiel has with La Raza. Shouldn't he have clarified that matter? Or is Cruz himself pro-La Raza?

c) Why is "attacking a federal judge" for ANY reason "inappropriate" Do you believe they should be immune from legit criticism?

d) NO public official -- regardless of ethnicity and race -- should be immune to legitimate criticism -- whether it's their loyalty to the US, their commitment to the US Constitution, or their supposed PC impunity from criticism BASED ON RACE, COLOR, OR CREED.

e) Judge Curiel has indeed a conundrum; he has a conflict of interest based on his membership in the San Diego La Raza Lawyers Association, and their loyalty to annexing USA as part of Mexico. Moreover, his law firm has paid $675,000 to the Clintons for speeches.

390 posted on 06/09/2016 7:38:10 AM PDT by HangUpNow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson