[justlurking]

You have two choices, lose graciously or win ugly. This is winning while you prefer the former.

You can "win ugly" if you choose your weapons carefully.

Good weapons are: "conflict of interest", "questionable associations".

Bad weapons are: "He's Mexican".

[bray]

How many elections have you won? I am 10 of 12.
People get it even though you don’t.

[bootless]

>>You can “win ugly” if you choose your weapons carefully.

Good weapons are: “conflict of interest”, “questionable associations”.

Bad weapons are: “He’s Mexican”. <<

justlurking, your arguments make sense. We can’t pretend that the MSM is going to present anything but the tippy-top of the narrative. We know they do it... it’s important not to hand them extra ammo.

I haven’t followed the case all the way through, but perhaps you can answer this question. Has Curiel been on the case since the beginning? Also, whenever he took this case on, why wouldn’t Trump’s legal team challenge his connections and potential conflict of interest at the outset? Thanks.