Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Baidu: Driverless Cars Will Be Better Drivers Than Humans
wsj ^ | 06/02/2016

Posted on 06/04/2016 5:45:43 AM PDT by BenLurkin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: bigbob

This is the final push to make cars so expensive that the average human will never be able to afford them. The push to urbanize and socialize continues.


21 posted on 06/04/2016 6:39:27 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins

>>You haven’t been to Oregon....where people drive UNDER the posted speed<<

Indeed I have — there and Hawaii (the latter even has minimum speed limits posted).


22 posted on 06/04/2016 7:00:49 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (Don't mistake my silence for ignorance, my calmness for acceptance, or my kindness for weakness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

>>True, and this will leave humans free to text and facebook while going to/from Walmart.
<<

They do it now with complete abandon.


23 posted on 06/04/2016 7:01:48 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (Don't mistake my silence for ignorance, my calmness for acceptance, or my kindness for weakness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: central_va

>>This is the final push to make cars so expensive that the average human will never be able to afford them. The push to urbanize and socialize continues.
<<

The $$ is in the R&D, not the equipment. It is in no one’s interest to price average people out of the market.

The push to socialize and urbanize will reveal itself when they start taxing driverless vehicles.


24 posted on 06/04/2016 7:04:46 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (Don't mistake my silence for ignorance, my calmness for acceptance, or my kindness for weakness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

If the damn driverless car is talking back and forth to someone when it’s supposed to have its sensors on the road, then I want NOTHING TO DO WITH IT.


25 posted on 06/04/2016 7:08:34 AM PDT by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
The $$ is in the R&D, not the equipment. It is in no one’s interest to price average people out of the market.

Cars are already twice as expensive as they need to be. This will push it over the top.

Right now, the technology alone adds $70,000 to $100,000 to the cost of a vehicle. Few people could pay that much more for a magic flying carpet, let alone a car. Automakers are wrestling to make it affordable, and there are projections that by the time autocars go into mass production, the additional cost might fall to between $3,000 and $5,000.

26 posted on 06/04/2016 7:15:14 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

I have worked in embedded software for 45 years. Something ALWAYS occurs that the software can’t handle. Programmers are not gods.


27 posted on 06/04/2016 7:16:59 AM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

“Murphy” happens. He’s the law and he doesn’t shive a git if the car has a driver or not.


28 posted on 06/04/2016 7:18:32 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Clinton supporters are the people Alexis de Toqueville warned us about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Absolute bull$hit.


29 posted on 06/04/2016 7:18:52 AM PDT by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TalBlack
If all cars were driverless there would be no “volume” delays.

Modern air traffic control simulates each aircraft from takeoff to landing, including insertion into the pattern. Aircraft take off and land at no closer than 30 second intervals, generally 1 minute intervals. It is all these computers can do at the national volume of aircraft.

Driverless cars will not have the benefit of an outside computer plotting and interleaving individual trips. I suspect driverless cars are destined to look like a bad idea.

30 posted on 06/04/2016 7:21:23 AM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Sigh...I guess we'll never see another "doughnut".


31 posted on 06/04/2016 7:21:52 AM PDT by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob
Think of riding on an attraction at Disney World vs. how driving is done today

Disney rides are all on tracks.

32 posted on 06/04/2016 7:22:18 AM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Delta 21

Gotta admit, that was funny.

And a Volvo to boot...


33 posted on 06/04/2016 7:24:49 AM PDT by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

Murphy was an optimist.


34 posted on 06/04/2016 7:25:55 AM PDT by kosciusko51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
In some ways they might be "superior" because they would all be aware of each other instead of texting, etc.

OTOH, there are critical places where they may be a death sentence when a human could take terrain, escape routes, etc., into consideration.

There have been cases where "stability control" has caused cars to lose control where a human might not because they can't see/recognize a pothole/loose sand or gravel, and other conditions and take them into account.

35 posted on 06/04/2016 7:28:44 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GingisK

>>Programmers are not gods.<<

YOU TAKE THAT BACK!!!

;)


36 posted on 06/04/2016 7:34:25 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (Don't mistake my silence for ignorance, my calmness for acceptance, or my kindness for weakness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

They’ll certainly be better drivers than Chinese people!


37 posted on 06/04/2016 7:36:55 AM PDT by Captainpaintball (It appears that we no longer wish to keep our Republic, Mr. Franklin...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captainpaintball

I’m thinking that they might drive just like Chinese people.


38 posted on 06/04/2016 7:38:48 AM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: GingisK

Yeah , we will have to create a Federal Motor Vehicle Traffic Control bureaucracy, and turn over our control to a centralized government type agency.

That would be bad.

Its probly already in the works.


39 posted on 06/04/2016 7:39:33 AM PDT by Delta 21 (Patiently waiting for the jack booted kick at my door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: GingisK

>>Driverless cars will not have the benefit of an outside computer plotting and interleaving individual trips. I suspect driverless cars are destined to look like a bad idea.<<

It will probably be massive cooperative processing where all the cars talk to all their neighbors all the time and also monitor them to make sure everyone does what it says it is going to do.

There will probably shared operational nodes (think cell tower functions in that milieu) to coordinate them all.

This is not dissimilar to how the Internet operates and when TCP/IP was introduced as part of a “web of webs” a scant 30 years ago, many said it was impossible to get more than a few hundred thousand on it (I know, I was there).

I am not saying there will be no errors — I am saying that after a point there will be no more than with human drivers.

The biggest problem will be the mix of humans and computers — I have no idea how that will be handled (except to kick human drivers off the highways).


40 posted on 06/04/2016 7:40:58 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (Don't mistake my silence for ignorance, my calmness for acceptance, or my kindness for weakness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson