Posted on 06/03/2016 12:40:59 PM PDT by ghosthost
It turned out that the white male the media intimated was responsible for the murder was actually a decidedly non-white male of Indian or Bengali descent named Mainak Sarkar, according to RedStateWatcher.
Making matters worse for the deceptive media, they seem to have been caught in the act of attempting to cover up both the race and religion of Sarkar in an effort to make his crime fit with a political narrative by editing his Everipedia profile before publicizing his name.
(Excerpt) Read more at worldpoliticus.com ...
All Units be on the lookout for a white male mass murderer from India named "Mainak Sarkar"
White Hispanic, like Zimmerman? Media lies
But saying that a person from the subcontinent of India is a white-male is very acceptable...
Well the guy was quite likely a Caucasian. Skin color is not = to race........No matter what the leftys claim.
His surname appears to be a "caste" name, if you go digging around for Indian/Bengali roots.
Maniac?
Of course they lied about his race and religion. That’s what they do. They would have made him out to be a catholic priest if they thought they could get away with it.
Filthy lying media is helping turn this country over to our replacements, the muzzies.
Where did you get that info?
He looks Amish to me
You're right! I see no difference
Islam
53.4%
Hinduism
44.5%
So, it's possible that he IS a Muslim. Don't know much about the absorption of the Hindu ways by the Mughal Muslim conquerors/rulers.
So it really doesn't look like jihad although could have pushed him over the edge. More like a revenge killing it appears so far.
While it is the tradition to adopt an Arab/Islamic name when converting to Islam, Subcontinent India has a long history with Islam, Hinduism and Buddhism and thus, I believe, the name is not an absolute indicator.
Looks more or less white to me. Of course I grew up in the days before there were 57 varieties. We has 3. Maybe he’d been eating too much curry or garam masala.
But WTF is with the media/web sites? He’s Islam, he’s Hindu. Might as well be a Pastafarian at this point. Or Pastastani, BeanCurdistani, whatever.
Liberals need to change the crime percentage numbers......if he isn’t African-American and he’s not, then he has to be white. It’s black or white, no gray for them.
They need to lump everybody into the “White” category so that we all believe that crime is spiraling out of control and they can take our weapons. In reality, if you factor out everyone else, and look at only the truly “White” criminals, the US has about the same crime rate as Austria, Finland, or any other White nation. Factor in the muslims, latinos and blacks and it’s the Wild West! We’ve got to do something about those guns!
Caucasian for sure. Whatever happened to that fine old descriptor, swarthy? (Rhetorical)
Yeah, I didn’t realize that Bengal had been conquered by the Islamic Moghuls, and that it’s more than 50% Muslim [53%].
I presume Sarkar himself was the one who provided the info about being a moslem.
Where was the security provided by the Univ. Of Californistan to protect their employees?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.