Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: sunrise_sunset

I agree the zoo had no choice, the could not take chances.

However, to me it looked like the gorilla was trying to protect the child. Perhaps it was dragging the child to a more secure location. We won’t ever know what it was thinking but there is a reasonable chance that it was not going to hurt the child. There was also a reasonable chance it would have hurt the child. So the zoo had to err on the side of caution.

The villians here are the parents.


50 posted on 05/30/2016 11:10:16 AM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Lorianne

There are no parents involved, just a single mother and probably 3 different baby daddies...


134 posted on 05/30/2016 1:44:29 PM PDT by Smittie (Just like an alien, I'm a stranger in a strange land)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

Gorillas are often given novel items to keep them from being bored. These items often contain treats. These items are often slammed around a great deal as the gorillas explore their characteristics and figure out how to obtain the treats.

It is unlikely that the gorilla saw this child as anything other than a novel item and was quite surprised and agitated by the loud reaction of the crowd. Stop anthropomorphizing, the child was in serious danger.


156 posted on 05/30/2016 2:33:57 PM PDT by Valpal1 (If the police can t solve a problem with violence, they ll find a way to fix it with brute force)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson