[Pelham]

How do you explain this?

https://www.docketalarm.com/cases/PTAB/IPR2015-00189/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._7418504/12-03-2014-PM-37191/Exhibit-2003-VirnetX_Exhibit_2003/

and note that $368,160,000 figure at the bottom. The one that gets tripled if the judge also decides that the infringement by Apple was willful.

I don’t think that the law abiding get stuck with a 9 digit judgment. Thieves do.

Of course this all depends on whether the EDT or the PTAB case gets finalized first. And whether the Supremes put the kibosh on the damage that the CAFC and PTAB have been doing to NPE inventors and patent owners. It’s not a done deal.

[palmer]

Looks like it was written by an illiterate.

[Swordmaker]

and note that $368,160,000 figure at the bottom. The one that gets tripled if the judge also decides that the infringement by Apple was willful.

That case was adjudicated in 2012 and has already been RETRIED for a larger amount. The judge already ruled in the TWO cases that it was not willful. Where have you been? You claim to know everything there is to know about it but you don't know that?