“I do know the case and followed it closely.”
Really?
Then explain how it is that you don’t know the very basic fact that all four patents were found valid and infringed in the Rocket Docket and that that decision stands.
How did you manage to get that part completely backwards, what with your extensive knowledge and all?
What part of "The United States Patent and Trademarks Office invalidated the in suit patents" during Apple's appeals do you fail to comprehend. I stated that above a couple of times. I am not referring at all to the trial where I made it clear that the Jury in East Texas Rocket Docket, the most plaintiff friendly courts in the country, did not have the expertise or understanding to comprehend even the first thing about a very technical issue.
Your dismissive and insulting attitude is getting in the way of your comprehension.