The Truth Warming Alarmists Don’t Want You To Know About The Climate Models

Investor's Business Daily ^ | 5/25/2016 | Kerry Jackson

[IBD editorial writer]

The global warming alarmists tell us to trust the science. But when it comes to climate studies, there’s less science and more accounting going on there.

[Sam Gamgee]

Good point. I was thinking of investment banks that use models to allocate their money. My understanding is that for all their modelling they rarely beat average returns.

[DuncanWaring]

At my place of employment we build computer models into our products and use other computer models to test our products.

We can do this because we also demonstrate that our computer models match the actual physical devices they model.

[MCRD]

Your post is brilliant. I've never thought of these phony climate models in the way you just posted and I've been a huge skeptic of this B. S. since Al Gore was inventing it. You should re post this to every globull warming article that gets posted here on Free Republic.

[Zeneta]

If the “climate models” were actually any good, they could be set to the conditions of 1916, and then run to produce a hundred-year “forecast” which matched the historical record of the last century.

If that could be done, they would have done it and the climate “scientists” would be shouting it from the rooftops.

But they are, obviously, not.

Because they can’t.

Because the models are crap.

---

Actually, they probably can and did, but weren’t happy with the projections.

BTW, I like your analogy with the Stock Market.

[little jeremiah]

Placemark