That's an interesting perspective you've got there!
I wish my perspective could reflect as hopefully as that seems to express.
What I see are corrupt, intransigent outposts in government where the Will of their Master is done despite every law or good glimpse of morality. The sychophants appointed to those posts have been trained to look for the cushy appointment, get a fat bonus, hope for the promotion, help get their acquaintances on the Left get elected, go on nice junkets with the family, lather, rinse and repeat. All for the lowly price of selling their souls, which probably was of little value to begin with--such as the DU trolls that lurk and obfuscate here at FR.
None of the transactions between Master and Slave would be based on meritorious, moral, productive services within the scope of the position they might hold. But, of course, they'd do just enough "real work" to provide cover for their paybacks (see Comey). They've learned patronage and salted it with 'a little' "if you ain't cheatin', you ain't tryin'", they see that corruption to them means increasing their chances of winning the career lotto and possibly getting the wife-and-fambly a new boat to show off at the marina.
In the case of Comey, note that H-> let slip, "But I do think--you know--having him [FBI Director Comey] say that my answers to the FBI were truthful and then I should quickly add, what I said was consistent with what I had said publicly, and ...and that's really, uh--sort of--in my view trying to tie both--uh--ends together" (emphasis mine).
"You know, having him say..." Hmmmmmmmmmm!
In the case of a governmental hoax, the job of these outposts is to distort and sit on factual information that might give up the con. They'll not deliver faithfully on FOIA requests, but do their darndest, sometimes with the most creative, cute weasle-speak, to justify what they've done or avoided doing. They'll lie if they--at all--think they can get away with it--at any level. To their bosses, those are the features of someone who's trying really hard to kiss up.
That the info appears to keep coming is the inverse of reality. Certain laws, especially FOIA, were supposedly set up to make sure there is a mandated flow of information between government and the citizenry, as if they were respectful of "Of the People, By the People and For the People."
For the corrupt, FOIA is an enforceable mechanism for gate-keeping. For them, nothing is allowed to the People except what is metered out by a potentially-corrupt gate-keeper. Lies can allowed to slip through, knowing that any truth from a well-meaning whistle-blower can be dealt with swiftly and severely. Such whistle-blowers will be taught painful lessons. Whistle-blower protections in past the two and a half decades have eroded ever increasingly to the point that current government worker conditioning is that a whistleblower is someone likely to get fired quickly if not hefty jail time as well.
Leaving aside the emotional outbursts of those who quickly blurt out truths they perceive, based on things that would never stand up in a court of law, tempered journalists are left to piece together supportable facts, then go back to get more information, not just until a proof has been identified, but until a proof is also bullet-proof.
So what looks like "info [that] keeps coming" is actually often long-overdue, precious details that have painstakingly been achieved by threaded several needles to get past the gatekeepers and re-assembled by what used to be called "investigative journalists," but are now self-identified criminals, insofar as government is concerned).
Take for example, the following:
The USCG, now beholden to the Department of Homeland Security, has twenty-seven months after the crash claimed in writing it has no record of “any (USCG) piloted craft” in the Kalaupapa area on December 11, 2013.
It’s been elsewhere copiously documented that the USCG had sent at least two Dolphin rescue helicopters, a C-130 fixed-wing Command aircraft, two Coast Guard patrol boat/cutters, two Medium Sized Rescue Boats and one "specially-equipped boat," the F/V Finback to the specified area.
The two excerpts cited middle-left below the letter are from the USCG Official Case Report #665884, received via an earlier FOIA request, which mentions all those craft about which the USCG now represents it is now unable to find relevant information. The USCG failed in its lawful duty to report this information for the FOIA request. That is, if it didn't blatantly lie!
Since the US Navy also went through a denial phase for this particular event, coming clean only much later, perhaps this has become the new standard for government intransigence, wearing out FOIA requesters by seeing justice delayed and having to jump through more hoops and appeals at every turn. Since there is proof the USCG has with this recent letter misrepresented the truth—unless perhaps like the FAA, the USCG has destroyed records—nothing more in a positive light deserves to be said. 