Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Robert DeLong

It is a myth

There has never been a fully functional male and female in the same human body ever documented

There are some with mismatched sexual apparatus

Immature ovarian tissue in a man

Penis looking clitoris and hood

Mammarial conflict

But never a true hermaphrodite that I’ve ever read of documented


91 posted on 05/02/2016 3:47:38 PM PDT by wardaddy (gonna need a lot of rope and lamposts and gibbets after this primary season.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]


To: wardaddy
There has never been a fully functional male and female in the same human body ever documented.

That is correct, but they do possess both sexual organs, in appearance at least, and indeed they do self identify as one sex or the other. That is why they call it gender confusion, as well as, hermaphrodite. So born at birth with what appears to be female genitalia and raised as a girl only to find out later that they are really a male, or vice versa. You see I do have compassion for these people, as I am sure most people do for those truly affected by this medical abnormality. They are not the ones that present a danger. It's the pretenders that will seek to take advantage and become predators that present the real problem and dangers.

That is what makes life difficult. Everything is not just black or white. There are a lot of gray areas as well. How do we handle these gray areas while still providing the highest possible protection to women and children, this is the dilemma. Three separate bathrooms? Of course that then puts an additional burden on businesses, and affects the smaller business the hardest. Then when it comes to schools and shower/locker rooms the additional burden is placed on tax payers.

Anyway, this whole part of the discussion was brought about when the scenario of both organs being present and which bathroom should those people use. A valid question indeed, and the answer is not a simple one.

109 posted on 05/02/2016 8:02:31 PM PDT by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

To: wardaddy

“It is a myth”

You started out talking about a “genuine hermaphrodite”, then you changed the subject to who and who is not a “true hermaphrodite”, and now you are trying to claim a “true hermaphrodite” is a myth and does not exist because there are no documented cases of being self impregnated. Those comments are wrong and represent a strawman argument, because you are misrepresenting the definition of an hermaphrodite as requiring self impregnation, when in reality the term encompasses a wide variety of different conditions which result in the presence of ovarian and testicular tissue without being fully functional.

“There has never been a fully functional male and female in the same human body ever documented”

The definition of an hermaphrodite or true hermaphrodite has never required the full functionality of the testicular and ovarian tissues, much less a capability for self impregnation.

[....]

“But never a true hermaphrodite that I’ve ever read of documented”

The definition of an hermaphrodite or true hermaphrodite has never required the full functionality of the testicular and ovarian tissues, much less a capability for self impregnation. Consequently, your objections are the actual myth.


116 posted on 05/02/2016 10:48:07 PM PDT by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson